Archive for the ‘climate and weather’ Category

The real Climategate

Wednesday, February 15th, 2012

A couple of years ago I posted about the campaign to manufacture doubt about climate change. Now, one of the key groups behind that campaign, the Heartland Institute, has been unmasked and many of their internal documents and emails leaked.

Internal Heartland Institute strategy and funding documents obtained by DeSmogBlog expose the heart of the climate denial machine – its current plans, many of its funders, and details that confirm what DeSmogBlog and others have reported for years. The heart of the climate denial machine relies on huge corporate and foundation funding from U.S. businesses including Microsoft, Koch Industries, Altria (parent company of Philip Morris) RJR Tobacco and more.

This is the real Climategate.

The Mysterious Missing Eruption of 1258 A.D.

Friday, February 10th, 2012

The cause of the Little Ice Age that affected much of the Northern hemisphere from 1300 or so onwards is still unknown. There’s been speculation that it had to do with a change in the sun’s output, or a periodic fluctuation in the Earth’s orbit. Or possibly a volcanic explosion. New research seems to support the volcano theory, but there’s one problem – scientists have been unable to identify the volcano despite having evidence there was an eruption.

Over the last few weeks, we’ve seen a number of high-profile studies come out looking at global climate that refer to a mystery. According to ice core and sediment core records from many places on the globe, there was a very large volcanic eruption in 1258 A.D. — so big that it injected somewhere between 190-270 megatonnes into the atmosphere (to put in another way, it produced between 300 and 600 megatonnes of sulfuric acid). This would make the 1258 eruption ~8 times larger than Krakatau in 1883 and two times larger than Tambora in 1815 (when comparing their sulfate injection mass; Emile-Geay et al., 2008). So, how does the geologic community (or historical community for that matter) not have any record of such an massive eruption that happened less than 800 years ago?

Video: Are Cosmic Rays Causing Global Warming

Monday, September 19th, 2011

There was a recent study done by researchers at CERN that’s been widely misinterpreted as proving that cosmic rays drive climate change. This video by Peter Hadfield explains what the paper really did say by reading the paper itself (what a concept!) instead of right-wing, climate denier blogs. Thanks to Little Green Footfalls for pointing this one out.

This meme has now achieved “article of faith” status in the wingnut climate change denying blogosphere; we’ve had a front page article and several LGF Pages debunking it, but of course the wingers never read any of that stuff; they just keep gloating away, smug and secure and invincibly ignorant. A few days ago, we even had the communications director of the right wing propaganda factory known as theHeartland Institute, Jim Lakely, register an LGF account and bring up the CERN study in one of his first comments.

Republican candidates and science

Friday, September 9th, 2011

Last night’s Republican presidential debate made it clear that the Republican party, and its supporters, have lost whatever hold they have on reality and are living in an alternate universe dominated by religious mania and magical thinking. If any of these people get elected, it will spell the end of the United States as technological and scientific power.

Discover’s Bad Science blog has a good article on the debate and the candidates’ attitudes towards scientific topics like evolution and global warming.

So, last night was another debate among the Republican candidates for President. While Ron Paul appears to have done quite well, at least according to an MSNBC poll, it was Rick Perry who is grabbing headlines.

Of course, that’s because what he said was outrageously awful. About climate science, he said, “…just because you have a group of scientists that have stood up and said here is the fact, Galileo got outvoted for a spell.” That analogy is so ridiculous it’s hard to know where to start; but a good place might be to simply say that Galileo had the advantage of being right. Just because a tiny fraction of people claim global warming isn’t real, or that humans aren’t responsible, doesn’t make them correct. Especially when going up against the overwhelming evidence compiled by a consensus of 97% of scientists who study climate as their career.

Also, the religiously conservative Perry should be a bit more circumspect on his analogies. It wasn’t scientists who were fighting Galileo, it was religious conservatives.

Three climate change articles

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

Time to tweak the deniers again. Here are a few articles about climate change science.

First, it’s been widely reported that the Sun seems to be going into quiet mode, and the right-wing blogosphere is full of posts about the coming of a mini ice age. Well, that’s just not going to happen and this detailed article in RealClimate explains why.

It remains to be seen whether this prognosis turns out to be true (there have been some doubts expressed), but since grand minima of solar activity did occur in the past, it is certainly interesting to explore what effects such a minimum might have on 21st century climate if it did occur. This is precisely the question Stefan Rahmstorf and I investigated in a study published last year (see also our press release. (Earlier estimates for the size of this effect can be found here andhere.) In our study we find that a new Maunder Minimum would lead to a cooling of 0.3°C in the year 2100 at most – relative to an expected anthropogenic warming of around 4°C. (The amount of warming in the 21st century depends on assumptions about future emissions, of course).

Another widely-held denier belief is that volcanoes are the primary contributor of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. That’s not the case.

In compiling all the studies that have looked at global annual volcanic CO2 emissions, Gerlach offers a range of 0.13-0.44 billion metric tons (gigatons) per year. To further refine the range, Gerlach chooses an annual average of 0.15-0.26 gigatons. This includes all subaeral and submarine eruptions worldwide. That sounds like a lot, doesn’t it? We’re talking hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide released each year. Where do humans stand in comparison? Oh, merely 35 gigatons. Yes, 35. That makes volcanoes look like small fry.

Let’s look at one more. Arctic sea ice is coming back after a period of decline. Well, not quite.

It’s been known for some time that the ice sheet in the arctic is thinning. And now, a new study(PDF) by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program lays this out in grim detail.

The report lists 15 key findings about the changes at the Earth’s northern regions.Fifteen. Here are four that alarmed me particularly:


1) The past six years (2005–2010) have been the warmest period ever recorded in the Arctic. Higher surface air temperatures are driving changes in the cryosphere.

3) The extent and duration of snow cover and sea ice have decreased across the Arctic. Temperatures in the permafrost have risen by up to 2 °C. The southern limit of permafrost has moved northward in Russia and Canada.

7) The Arctic Ocean is projected to become nearly ice-free in summer within this century, likely within the next thirty to forty years.

That should do for now. I’m sure I could come up with a few more worthwhile articles if I had the time.

Global warming might not be good for Canadian arctic

Sunday, May 29th, 2011

There’s a common assumption that global warming will make the Canadian arctic and its resources more accessible, but that’s not the case according to a new report by climate researchers.

“This study would suggest that Canada has more to lose that it realizes,” senior author Laurence Smith, a UCLA climate researcher, said in a telephone interview.

“Popular conception has it that the Arctic is thawing, that it is opening up, and we’ll go in there and get the resources,” he says. “This study shows it is not as simple as that. In fact much of the landscape will become less accessible.“

The researchers used climate models and data on sea ice, land cover and topography to assess how Arctic transportation will change as temperatures rise due to heat-trapping greenhouse gases being pumped into the atmosphere through the burning of coal and other fossil fuels.

The study says winter roads, built over frozen lakes and land, will be a major casualty in all eight Arctic countries— Canada, Finland, Denmark (Greenland), Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and the United States. Canada and Russia will be hit hardest because they are so big.