Monday, February 15, 2010

Video debunks Earth has been cooling myth 

I've posted here before about the climate denial industry fostering myths like "the Earth has been cooling for the last ten years". Here's a video that examines that myth in more detail and makes provides some guidelines for separating myth from fact in the climate change debate.
This video also looks at whether other planets are also warming, and an Internet myth that NASA is now attributing warming to the sun. In this video I examine the importance of sources -- tracking information back to a source and making sure the source is credible. My sources are cited in the video, but I'll also post them here. Sources are also cited throughout my climate change series. These videos are not a personal opinion or a theory of my own; I'm not a climate scientist or a researcher and I have no qualifications to do anything other than report on what real climate scientists have discovered through their research. So there's no point in disagreeing with me. If you dislike their conclusions, take it up with the researchers I cite. If I've made a mistake in reporting their conclusions, please pooint out the mistake and I will happily correct it. If you think you know better than the experts, write a paper and have it published in a respected, peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Labels: ,


Sunday, February 14, 2010

Idiots 

If you want a good example of how stupid governments can be, you'd be hard pressed to find a better example than the recent decision by the US government not to shut down the link between the Mississippi River and the Great Lakes - a canal that runs through Chicago. What's at risk? The entire fishing industry, commercial and recreational, of the Great Lakes.

With marauding Asian carp on the Great Lakes' doorstep, the federal government has crafted a $78.5 million battle plan that offers no assurance of thwarting an invasion and doesn't use the most promising weapon available to fight it off.

The surest way to prevent the huge, hungry carp from gaining a foothold in the lakes and threatening their $7 billion fishing industry is to sever the link between Lake Michigan and the Mississippi River basin, created by engineers in Chicago more than a century ago.

The strategy released by the Obama administration this week agrees only to conduct a long-range study of that idea, which could take years. The government also refuses to shut down two navigational locks on Chicago waterways that could provide an easy pathway for the carp into the lakes, although it promises to consider opening them less often.

Labels: ,


Saturday, February 13, 2010

Full Screen Weather - good, no frills weather 

Full Screen Weather is a new service launched by one of my favourite weather sites, Weather Underground. Give it your postal code or zip code, and it'll overlay Google Maps of your area with your local weather information - mine is pulled in from the Glenn Rouge station just a few kilometres away. You can overlay clouds and satellite views as well. An overlay frame gives you more detailed information. This gets priority placement in my links bar.

Labels:


Saturday, February 06, 2010

Arctic sea ice melting faster than predicted 

According to research conducted in 2008, the Arctic sea ice is melting faster than projections and threatens the Arctic's ecosystem.
The melting ice poses different threats. Barber said the ice is full of toxic contaminants, which are released back into the environment when the ice melts. Wildlife in the Arctic is negatively impacted by the loss of ice and degraded habitat. Animals that live in the Arctic will also experience more competition for resources as species move north. And finally, the melting ice contributes to global warming, and while there was no prediction made as to when we might expect the Arctic to be mostly melted, the impacts will be apparent in the world long before most of the ice is lost. Barber said the warming of the Arctic influenced the jet stream, which then causes warm air to move further north.

Labels: , ,


Monday, December 28, 2009

Get that lettuce while you can 

From Discover, some bad news about California's water usage:
The team used the GRACE satellites to measure tiny fluctuations in the planet’s gravitational field. Researchers often use them to track changes in ice sheets, but this turning these orbiters on California allowed them to see the how much the pull on the planet had lessened there, and thus how much water had been lost from the ground.

The satellites can detect changes in the amount of water in a region but not how much is left. Regardless of how much water remains in the aquifer, the researchers note that a declining water table will degrade water quality and will eventually force Californians to drill deeper wells [Science News]. That’s bad news not just for Californians: the Central Valley accounts for an estimated one-twelfth of the nation’s agricultural production.

“The numbers we’re getting out of this analysis point to groundwater use at unsustainable rates,” said Professor Jay Famiglietti of the University of California, Irvine. “It’s leading to declining water tables, decreased crop sizes, and continued land subsidence – something that has been going on in the Central Valley for decades”

Labels: ,


Saturday, December 05, 2009

Hackers target Canadian climate scientists 

Here's a disquieting bit of news from Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog. Canadian climate researchers at the University of Victoria have been the target of hackers and one scientist has had his office broken into twice and his papers rumnaged through.
These incidents took place at the Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis, an Environment Canada facility located at the university. In addition, Dr. Andrew Weaver, a Canadian climate scientist working at the University of Victoria and a key contributor to the Nobel prize-winning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, had his office broken into twice late last year, and his papers rummaged through and a dead computer stolen. "The key thing is to try to find anybody who's involved in any aspect of the IPCC and find something that you can...take out of context," Dr. Weaver said.

More about it in the National Post.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Counter climate change contrarians 

Scientific American has an article that lists seven of the most common arguments used by climate change contrarians and refutes them. Here's an excerpt, citing one argument used in that anti-climate-change radio commercials I mentioned in my blog post Sunday.
Claim 3: Global warming stopped a decade ago; the earth has been cooling since then.

1998 was the world's warmest year in the U.K. Met Office Hadley Centre’s records; recent years have been cooler; therefore, the previous century's global warming trend is over, right?

Anyone with even a glancing familiarity with statistics should be able to spot the weaknesses of that argument. Given the extended duration of the warming trend, the expected (and observed) variations in the rate of increase and the range of uncertainties in the temperature measurements and forecasts, a decade's worth of mild interruption is too small a deviation to prove a break in the pattern, climatologists say.

Recently, Associated Press reporter Seth Borenstein asked four independent statisticians to look for trends in the temperature data sets without telling them what the numbers represented. "The experts found no true temperature declines over time," he wrote.

The article is heavily linked to original sources.

Labels: ,


Sunday, November 29, 2009

Manufactured doubt and climate change 

This is going to be a much longer post than usual, but I think it's worth reading.

There have been some really interesting articles this week, all dealing with the subject of climate change and how public opinion is being manipulated by the manufactured doubt industry -- the same people who kept the tobacco industry in business for many years despite medical research showing it caused cancer and who fought banning CFCs despite clear evidence they were destroying the Earth's ozone layer. Now they're working for the oil industry, sowing the seeds of doubt about man-made climate change.

First we have this superb post, The Manufactured Doubt industry and the hacked email controversy by Dr. Jeff Masters. Here, in one short excerpt, you'll see what's at work here:
Let's look at the amount of money being spent on lobbying efforts by the fossil fuel industry compared to environmental groups to see their relative influence. According to Center for Public Integrity, there are currently 2,663 climate change lobbyists working on Capitol Hill. That's five lobbyists for every member of Congress. Climate lobbyists working for major industries outnumber those working for environmental, health, and alternative energy groups by more than seven to one. For the second quarter of 2009, here is a list compiled by the Center for Public Integrity of all the oil, gas, and coal mining groups that spent more than $100,000 on lobbying (this includes all lobbying, not just climate change lobbying):

Chevron $6,485,000
Exxon Mobil $4,657,000
BP America $4,270,000
ConocoPhillips $3,300,000
American Petroleum Institute $2,120,000
Marathon Oil Corporation $2,110,000
Peabody Investments Corp $1,110,000
Bituminous Coal Operators Association $980,000
Shell Oil Company $950,000
Arch Coal, Inc $940,000
Williams Companies $920,000
Flint Hills Resources $820,000
Occidental Petroleum Corporation $794,000
National Mining Association $770,000
American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity $714,000
Devon Energy $695,000
Sunoco $585,000
Independent Petroleum Association of America $434,000
Murphy Oil USA, Inc $430,000
Peabody Energy $420,000
Rio Tinto Services, Inc $394,000
America's Natural Gas Alliance $300,000
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America $290,000
El Paso Corporation $261,000
Spectra Energy $279,000
National Propane Gas Association $242,000
National Petrochemical & Refiners Association $240,000
Nexen, Inc $230,000
Denbury Resources $200,000
Nisource, Inc $180,000
Petroleum Marketers Association of America $170,000
Valero Energy Corporation $160,000
Bituminous Coal Operators Association $131,000
Natural Gas Supply Association $114,000
Tesoro Companies $119,000

Here are the environmental groups that spent more than $100,000:

Environmental Defense Action Fund $937,500
Nature Conservancy $650,000
Natural Resources Defense Council $277,000
Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund $243,000
National Parks and Conservation Association $175,000
Sierra Club $120,000
Defenders of Wildlife $120,000
Environmental Defense Fund $100,000

If you add it all up, the fossil fuel industry outspent the environmental groups by $36.8 million to $2.6 million in the second quarter, a factor of 14 to 1. To be fair, not all of that lobbying is climate change lobbying, but that affects both sets of numbers. The numbers don't even include lobbying money from other industries lobbying against climate change, such as the auto industry, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, etc.
Next, we have this article from the Globe and Mail, about a group dubiously calling itself Friends of Science, who are sponsoring a spectacularly wrongheaded series of radio ads.
Friends of Science, a Calgary-based non-profit group, is running a national radio advertising campaign mocking the whole idea of climate change that has mainstream environmental groups miffed.

The groups are claiming that funding for the anti-global warming effort is coming from the oil and gas industry.

James Hoggan, chair of the David Suzuki Foundation, lashed out Tuesday at Friends of Science in a speech in Toronto, calling it one of several “industry front groups” in North America that are trying to create uncertainty about the existence of climate change to undermine next month's United Nations climate change talks in Copenhagen.
The ads, which claim the planet has actually been becoming cooler in the past 10 years, have been running this month in 15 cities, including Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Calgary, according to the Friends of Science group.
I heard one of these on Q107 and I almost had to take a blood pressure pill. "The Earth isn't warming. It's coooling." I'd like to see the evidence for that statement, especially in light of this article in the Globe and Mail, which descirbes recent research that clearly refutes one of the claims often made by climate change deniers - that Arctic polar ice is increasing, not decreasing.
Experts around the world believed the ice was recovering because satellite images showed it expanding. But David Barber says the thick, multiyear frozen sheets crucial to the northern ecosystem have been replaced by thin “rotten” ice which can't support the weight of the bears.

“It caught us all by surprise because we were expecting there to be multiyear sea ice – the whole world thought it was multiyear sea ice,” said Dr. Barber, who just returned from an expedition to the Beaufort Sea.

“Unfortunately what we found was that the multiyear [ice] has all but disappeared. What's left is this remnant, rotten ice.”

Permanent ice, which is normally up to 10 metres thick, was easily pierced by the research ship, said Dr. Barber, who holds the Canada research chair in Arctic science at the University of Manitoba.

The team finally reached what it thought was stable ice, only to watch a crack appear just as researchers were preparing to descend onto the floe.

“As I watched, over the course of five minutes, the entire multiyear ice floe broke up into pieces,” Dr. Barber said. “This floe was 10 miles across. Something that's twice the size of Winnipeg, it just broke up right in front of our eyes.”

The ice is unable to withstand battering waves and storms because global warming is rapidly melting it at a rate of 70,000 square kilometres each year, he said.

Multiyear sea ice used to cover 90 per cent of the Arctic basin, Dr. Barber said. It now covers roughly 19 per cent. Where it used to be up to 10 metres thick, it's now two metres at most.
Maybe it's getting colder in Calgary, where the group is located, close to their oil-industry sponsors. There may be reason to doubt the role of humanity in climate change (although I think that it's pretty well settled), but that statement is a Big Lie in the same class with Holocaust denial.

Here's an article by Tyler Hamilton of the Toronto Star in which he looks at how the media are handling the climate change story, and finds them wanting.
I apologize on behalf of my profession.

If it's true that Canadians and Americans have become less concerned about the potential impact of climate change, and that more consider global warming a hoax, some blame can certainly be directed at the news media.

"The media (are) giving an equal seat at the table to a lot of non-qualified scientists," Julio Betancourt, a senior scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey, told a group of environment and energy reporters during a week-long learning retreat in New Mexico.

I was among them, listening to Betancourt and two of his colleagues describe the measurable impacts climate change is having on the U.S. southwest. Drought. More frequent and damaging forest fires. Northward migration of forest and animal species. Hotter, longer growing seasons. Less snow pack. Earlier snow melt.

"The scientific evidence reported in peer-reviewed journals is growing by the day, and it suggests the pace of climate change has surpassed the worst-case scenarios predicted just a few years ago.
Here's what he has to say about the recent hacking of climate change scientists' emails, about which I posted earlier this week.
The emails, from what I've read, do show that not all scientists agree, that some scientists don't like other scientists, and that some scientists are struggling with the complexity of their work. What these emails do not show is that there's any conspiracy or that consensus around the reality of human-influenced global warming is beginning to crack.

Still, that won't stop the skeptics from cherry picking what's in those emails and claiming this is some kind of smoking gun that will derail Copenhagen. The blogosphere is abuzz, and news media are never ones to turn down a juicy controversy. The timing of the hack makes it all the more suspicious, but no less dramatic.

It's a shame.
It really is. And we and our children are going to pay the price.

Finally, a column from the Star by Peter Gorrie looking at the issue of the Anglia emails. He ties the hack into both the campaign of disinformation that this post started out describing and the effects of the real warming that our planet is experiencing.
Black, they thunder, is white, and – skilled and persistent communicators that they are, with plentiful political, media and industry backing – they manage to convince, or at least confuse, many people.

Keep that in mind when considering the hacking of 4,000 emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit at Britain's University of East Anglia, a major centre of climate change study.

Climate skeptics claim a few bits extracted from those generally innocuous discussions among climate scientists – misunderstood or taken out of context – constitute a scandal. The gist: the scientists faked and fudged numbers, then masked their chicanery by attacking their opponents.

They skeptics got what they wanted from what many journalists, apparently without embarrassment, call "Climategate." We're now parsing emails and reporting demands for inquiries instead of focusing on the evidence of human-made climate change.

Tellingly, coverage of a new report that shows greenhouse gas emissions are rising and impacts are happening much faster than previously forecast was dwarfed by excitement over the emails.
This is one article that Tyler Hamilton won't have to apologize for.

Labels: , ,


Thursday, November 26, 2009

Those leaked climate e-mails 

There's been quite a bit of controversy in some circles about the e-mails from a climate research lab that were leaked after a hacker broke into the lab's servers. Some of the anti-climate-change sites are calling it ClimateGate and the like, and saying that it proves that global warming is a conspiracy among scientists. Here's one typical view, from Jerry Pournelle, whose views I generally respect -- except when it comes to climate change:

It's getting pretty clear what happened. These academics, who were influential in framing the UN climate report on which most of the political decisions on what to do about man-made global warming depend, became alarmed when the data over the past few years didn't support the predictions of their models. At this point they had a choice: to accept the new data and see what that did to the theory, or simply to cover it up because they were convinced the basic theory was correct and the issue was too important to allow the theory to come under serious doubt.


I tend to agree with the perspective in this post from BoingBoing.
Evidence of vast conspiracy is sorely lacking. Ditto evidence disproving the scientific consensus on climate change. This isn't the "nail in the coffin" of anything. However, the emails do prompt some legit questions about transparency and how professional researchers respond to criticism in the age of the armchair scientist.

In fact, the whole reason the CRU seems to have been hacked is that the Unit was fighting off requests for access to the data sets it used to put together its climate models. This is one of the issues that gets discussed in the e-mails. Basically, some of the CRU researchers didn't want to release the data to people who weren't trained scientists because they were tired of spending their time fighting with bloggers and wanted to focus on research. Which is great, except for two things: First, from what I'm reading it looks like there might have been some ethical lapses in how the researchers went about blocking the release of data; Second, when you block the release of data, no matter what your real reason is, people will assume it's because you're hiding something nefarious. One of the positive outcomes of this whole hacking debacle is that it's forcing some discussion about when circling the wagons becomes protectionism, and might lead to the climate change data sets becoming more open source. Frankly, I think that's a good thing.

Unfortunately, the whole issue just feeds into the neo-con, right wing, pro-conspiracy mindset. It's probably set the prospects for fighting climate change back by quite a lot. In the mean time, the ice caps will keep melting (Arctic sea ice was at a record low for the month of November this year), the oceans will keep getting more acidic (although there is some evidence that after an increase in Ph of .15 that they may have reached their limit), and by the end of the century, everything between 20 degrees of the equator will be uninhabitable.

The BoingBoing post includes an extensive set of links. Follow them, and draw your own conclusions.

Labels: , ,


Monday, November 23, 2009

Just because they're big, doesn't mean they're clean 

I've seen articles that propose that international shipping is reasonably "green" because of the efficiencies of scale - a single ship can carry as many as 14,000 shipping containers. But, as this article points out, that's just not true.
For 31 years, the IMO has operated a policy agreed by the 169 governments that make up the organisation which allows most ships to burn bunker fuel.

Christian Eyde Moller, boss of the DK shipping company in Rotterdam, recently described this as ‘just waste oil, basically what is left over after all the cleaner fuels have been extracted from crude oil. It’s tar, the same as asphalt. It’s the cheapest and dirtiest fuel in the world’.

Bunker fuel is also thick with sulphur. IMO rules allow ships to burn fuel containing up to 4.5 per cent sulphur. That is 4,500 times more than is allowed in car fuel in
the European Union. The sulphur comes out of ship funnels as tiny particles, and it is these that get deep into lungs.

Thanks to the IMO’s rules, the largest ships can each emit as much as 5,000 tons of sulphur in a year – the same as 50million typical cars, each emitting an average of 100 grams of sulphur a year.

With an estimated 800million cars driving around the planet, that means 16 super-ships can emit as much sulphur as the world fleet of cars.

Labels: , ,


Saturday, October 24, 2009

PIctures of pollution in China 

Chinese photographer won this year's ugene Smith Grant in Humanistic Photography for his documentary project “Pollution in China.” The pictures are stunning, both for their photographic and artistic quality, which is very high, but also for the subject matter, which shows just how far Chinese industry (and presumably the government, in collusion) will go in raping the environment in the name of the economy. Think of these, and the poor affected people many of them show, the next time you shop at Wal-Mart or your local big-box retailer, and by something with a "Made in China" label because it's cheap.

Labels: , , ,


Friday, September 25, 2009

Ice sheets melting fast 

According to this unsettling article in the Globe and Mail, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are melting faster than predicted.
New satellite information shows that ice sheets in Greenland and western Antarctica continue to shrink faster than scientists thought and in some places are already in runaway melt mode.

British scientists for the first time calculated changes in the height of the vulnerable but massive ice sheets and found them especially bad at their edges. That's where warmer water eats away from below. In some parts of Antarctica, ice sheets have been losing several metres a year in thickness since 2003, according to a paper published online in the journal Nature.

Some of those areas are about a kilometre thick, so they've still got plenty of ice to burn through. But the drop in thickness is speeding up. In parts of Antarctica, the yearly rate of thinning from 2003 to 2007 is 50-per-cent higher than it was from 1995 to 2003. These new measurements, based on 50 million laser readings from a NASA satellite, confirm what some of the more pessimistic scientists thought: The melting along the crucial edges of the two major ice sheets is accelerating and is in a self-feeding loop. The more the ice melts, the more water surrounds and eats away at the remaining ice.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, September 15, 2009

One year after Hurricane Ike 

The Boston Globe's Big Picture blog has another excellent photo essay, this one showing areas damaged by Hurricane Ike just after the storm and a year later. In some cases, you can click on a photo to get the after picture fading in over the original image. After seeing these pictures, there's no way I'd ever live on the Texas coast!

Labels: ,


Sunday, September 13, 2009

Oceans of Trouble 

Yesterday I listened to one of the scariest documentaries about the environment that I've heard. CBC's Quirks and Quarks science program did an entire show about the state of the oceans, based on the book, Sea Sick, by Alanna Mitchell. The show was divided into five parts; each part focused on a different problem (dead zones, ocean pH, coral reefs, fisheries, garbage zones).

The most worrisome part of the show was learning about the increase in the pH levels of oceans, an increase largely caused by increasing carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. The increase in the last century would be fatal to a human being if it occurred in their blood, and is having serious effects on oceanic life.

I highly recommend this show - you can download the podcast from the show's web page.

Labels: , ,


Sunday, August 09, 2009

A bad year for tomatoes 

It hasn't been a good year for tomatoes, at least on this side of the continent. Tomatoes like hot, sunny, and not too wet weather, which is exactly what we haven't been getting. Our tomato plants are about half the size they should be, and only a few have flowered, which means we probably won't get much of a crop at all. (Our zucchini are doing just fine, on the other hand). Part of the problem is that our garden gets a lot of shade from our neighbours' trees, but short of chain saw surgery, there's not much we can do about that.

But the wet, humid, and cool growing season isn't affecting just us. It's perfect weather for plant diseases, and tomato growers across the northeast have been hit with a widespread outbreak of late blight, a fungus that can lay waste to a tomato patch in a matter of days. And as this New York Times article points out, modern industrial farming and retailing practices are contributing to its spread.

But weather alone doesn’t explain the early severity of the disease this year. We’ve had wet, cool summers in the past, but it’s never been this bad. Instead we have to look at two other factors: the origin of the tomato plants many of us cultivate, and the renewed interest in gardening.

According to plant pathologists, this killer round of blight began with a widespread infiltration of the disease in tomato starter plants. Large retailers like Home Depot, Kmart, Lowe’s and Wal-Mart bought starter plants from industrial breeding operations in the South and distributed them throughout the Northeast. (Fungal spores, which can travel up to 40 miles, may also have been dispersed in transit.) Once those infected starter plants arrived at the stores, they were purchased and planted, transferring their pathogens like tiny Trojan horses into backyard and community gardens. Perhaps this is why the Northeast was hit so viciously: instead of being spread through large farms, the blight sneaked through lots of little gardens, enabling it to escape the attention of the people who track plant diseases.

Labels: ,


Saturday, May 30, 2009

Time lapse videos show how we're changing our planet 

Although I've seen many, many pictures of the Earth from space, until now I haven't seen any time-lapse videos. Here are some showing how we're changing the face of our planet, mostly in unfortunate ways. The video of Amazonian deforestation is quite sobering.

Labels: ,


Monday, May 11, 2009

Could a tsunami hit New York? 

We don't usually think of the North American east coast as being prone to tsunamis, but there is evidence that a large one hit the New York area about 2,300 years ago.
Steven Goodbred, an Earth scientist at Vanderbilt University, said large gravel, marine fossils and other unusual deposits found in sediment cores across the area date to 2,300 years ago.

The size and distribution of material would require a high velocity wave and strong currents to move it, he said, and it is unlikely that short bursts produced in a storm would suffice.

"If we're wrong, it was one heck of a storm," said Dr Goodbred.

If you think this is an unlikely scenario, remember that Newfoundland was hit by a tsunami in 1929.

Labels: , ,


Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Some Earth video for Earth day 

Since it's Earth day, it's appropriate to post some video of the Earth from space - a HD video of the Earth from the ISS, courtesy of NASA. Simply breathtaking.

Labels: ,


Sunday, April 19, 2009

The infinite Earth 

National Geographic have assembled a photomosaic of pictures that is essentially infinite in depth - you can keep drilling down and drilling down for more and more pictures. It's quite cool. Note that it will take some time to load the first time you use it.
What makes up our world? Dive into this photo-mosaic portrait of the Earth to see it through the eyes of users like you. It's made up of hundreds of photos of the natural world, each submitted by users to My Shot. (Submit a photo) Move the yellow square over an area you would like to explore, click, and go. Double-click on an image to see more information about it. Keep clicking—and diving deeper into the Infinite Photograph—to get a truly boundless picture of Earth.

Labels: ,


Friday, March 27, 2009

Red River Flooding 

The Boston Globe's Big Picture Blog has a photo essay on the Red River flooding currently happening in Manitoba and North Dakota. I hope the efforts of the people there are enough to hold back the flood - the scale of the flood and the relief effort are both impressive.

Labels: , ,


Monday, February 23, 2009

How to recycle beer bottles 

Buddhist monks in Thailand have set upon a great way of recycling beer bottles - they use them to build temples.
Sometimes known as Wat Lan Kuad, or Temple of a Million Bottles, the monks now use the empties to construct almost everything on the site, from the crematorium to the toilets.

The disused bottles don’t fade, provide good lighting and are easy to clean. And the eco-friendliness does not just stop at glass – mosaics around the temple, mostly of Buddha, are made out of bottle caps.

Update: I've fixed the link.

Labels:


Saturday, February 21, 2009

Volcanic eruption photos 

Volcanic eruptions are one of nature's most spectacular events. Here's a slide show of eruption photographs, most from the last couple of years. The most recent is from from the eruption of Chatien in Chile earlier this week.

I was fascinated by volcanoes as a child and read everything I could find about them. I remember having a nightmare that a volcano was erupting in the high school parking lot near my house -- an unlikely scenario considering that the Soo is on the edge of the Canadian shield, one of the most geologically stable areas in the world.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Nature on climate change 

The science journal, Nature, has an online section on climate change. Here's a summary of recent research from 2008. Here's part:
4. The hockey stick holds up

A follow-up to the infamous 1998 'hockey stick' curve confirmed that the past two decades are the warmest in recent history. Climatologist Michael Mann's contentious graph has become a symbol of the fierce debates on evidence for global warming, to the extent that an independent investigation into the study was performed at the request of US Congressman Joe Barton. The 2006 report that resulted from the Barton enquiry criticized Mann and colleagues for their reliance on tree-ring data from bristlecone pines as a proxy to reconstruct Northern Hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,000 years. Although their earlier work had been javascript:void(0)largely vindicated, in September the same team revised their global surface temperature estimates for the past 2,000 years, using a greatly expanded set of proxies, including marine sediments, ice cores, coral and historical documents (Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13252–13257; 2008). The team reconstructed global temperatures with and without inclusion of the tree-ring records: without their inclusion, the data showed that recent warming is greater than at any point in at least the past 1,300 years; inclusion of tree-ring data extended this period to at least 1,700 years. According to the Christian Science Monitor: "It still looks a lot like the much-battered, but still rink-ready stick of 1998. Today the handle reaches further back and it's a bit more gnarly. But the blade at the business end tells the same story.

Labels: ,


Sunday, January 25, 2009

Climate wars 

Vancouver SF writer Crawford Kilian has started another blog; this one called Climate Wars, focused on the effects of climate change on human society. If you want a picture of what the future might bring, read this article by Gwyn Dyer.
About two years ago, I realised that the military in
various countries were starting to do climate change scenarios in-house --
scenarios that started with the scientific predictions about rising
temperatures, falling crop yields, and other physical effects, and examined
what that would do to politics and strategy.
The scenarios predicted failed states proliferating because
governments couldn't feed their people; waves of climate refugees washing
up against the borders of more fortunate countries; even wars between
countries that shared the same rivers. So I started interviewing everybody
I could get access to: not only senior military people but scientists,
diplomats and politicians.
About seventy interviews, a dozen countries and eighteen
months later, I have reached four conclusions that I didn't even suspect
when I began the process. The first is simply this: the scientists are
really scared. Their observations over the past two or three years suggest
that everything is happening a lot faster than their climate models
predicted.
This creates a dilemma for them, because for the past decade they have been
struggling against a well-funded campaign that cast doubt on the phenomenon
of climate change. Now, finally, people and even governments are listening.
Even in the United States, the world headquarters of climate change denial,
85 percent of the population now sees climate change as a major issue, and
both presidential candidates in last month's election promised 80 percent
cuts in American emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Incredible Earth pictures 

Here's a series of striking pictures of the Earth from NASA's Earth Observatory site, courtesy of the Big Picture blog. There's some great wallpaper here, folks.

Labels: , , ,


Thursday, January 01, 2009

What's going on at Yellowstone? 

I was going to hold off posting until tomorrow, but this story is too important, and I haven't seen a lot of details about it in the mainstream media.

There's a lot of seismic activity in the Yellowstone National Park. While it might mean nothing, it might also be a precursor to an eruption. And Yellowstone is the site of one of the world's supervolcanoes - an eruption there could have devastating consequences for much of the US and Canada.

The best site I've seen for keeping on top of what's happening is Alan Sullivan's Fresh Bilge, in particular these posts: Influence, Yellowstone Caveats and New Year Fireworks.

Update: And for a somewhat less worrisome view, here's this post from the Discovery News: Earth Impacts blog.

Labels: , ,


Thursday, December 18, 2008

Font with holes saves ink 

A Dutch company has come up with a font it calls the Ecofont, which has holes in the stroke of the letters. The company claims that printing with the Ecofont can save 20 percent of the ink used in printing without sacrificing readability. You can download the font for free, although donations are requested.

Based on the sample, it would probably be OK at smaller size. As an alternative, check to see if your printer has a toner or ink saver mode. My Samsung laser printer has this feature, and I usually leave it on for all but the most critical printing - for most documents you don't really notice it, and it saves about 30 percent of the toner you'd otherwise use.

Labels: ,


Monday, November 10, 2008

Still trying to screw the environment 

George Bush's lame duck administration is indulging in a last-minute orgy of regulation setting that seems aimed at helping the administration's industrial buddies at the expense of the environment.
The rule changes include getting wolves off the Endangered Species List, allowing power plants to operate near national parks, relaxing regulations for factory farm waste and making it easier for mountaintop coal-mining operations. None have found much favour with environmental groups.

Hopefully, someone on Obama's team is keeping track of this so they can reverse the damage when they take office.

Labels: ,


Friday, October 10, 2008

Greenland ice melting faster than predicted 

One of the predictions that climate scientists have been making about global warming is that it would happen first and most severely in the world's arctic regions. Recent observations show that this summer had the highest observed snow melting in northern Greenland - almost double the average of the last thirty years.
“Having such extreme melting so far north, where it is usually colder than the southern regions is extremely interesting,” Professor Tedesco said. “In 2007, the record occurred in southern Greenland, mostly at high elevation areas where in 2008 extreme snowmelt occurred along the northern coast.”

Tedesco says that the runoff is 88 percent higher than the 1979 – 2007 mean. In addition, analysis of ground measurements from World Meteorological Organization automatic weather stations located close to where the record snowmelt was observed indicate surface/air maximum temperatures up to 3° Celsius above average.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Arctic methane being released 

It appears that large quantities of methane are being released into the atmosphere from melting methane clathrates on the Arctic sea floor. This is not good news, as methane is 20 times as a potent a greenhouse gas as carbon dioxide, and huge quantities of it are buried on the ocean floor.
Underground stores of methane are important because scientists believe their sudden release has in the past been responsible for rapid increases in global temperatures, dramatic changes to the climate, and even the mass extinction of species. Scientists aboard a research ship that has sailed the entire length of Russia's northern coast have discovered intense concentrations of methane – sometimes at up to 100 times background levels – over several areas covering thousands of square miles of the Siberian continental shelf.

In the past few days, the researchers have seen areas of sea foaming with gas bubbling up through "methane chimneys" rising from the sea floor. They believe that the sub-sea layer of permafrost, which has acted like a "lid" to prevent the gas from escaping, has melted away to allow methane to rise from underground deposits formed before the last ice age.

Labels: ,


Sunday, August 31, 2008

See what's going on in the Atlantic 

Check out this time-lapse satellite image of the entire Atlantic ocean. "The Hurricane Atlantic Satellite image shows clouds by their temperature over the Atlantic Ocean. Red and blue areas indicate cold (high) cloud tops." Pretty impressive, and I'm glad I'm not living anywhere near a coastline.

Labels:


Some weather blogs to follow 

If you want to follow the news about the current hurricane season, there are several good blogs to look at.

Labels:


Sunday, August 24, 2008

The era of oil wars 

Although oil prices have come down somewhat from their recent high, the long-term outlook may not be so rosy. This article in the Guardian looks at the possibility that oil prices could double by 2015 and the effect that this might have on world politics.
The geopolitical implications of this gathering crisis for world oil supply 2010-15 are immense. The risk of further military interventions and conflicts in the Middle East is clearly high. Total world oil reserves are estimated at 2.5-2.9 trillion barrels, of which half has now been already consumed, while half of the 51 oil-producing countries reported output declines in 2006. Non-Opec production is expected to peak and decline within the next five years, driven mainly by burgeoning demand from China and the US, together with restricted output from Iraq. Then in the following five years Opec's diminishing spare capacity will probably become increasingly unable to accommodate short-term fluctuations, depending on how fast world demand grows and how extensively Opec invests in new capacity. The latter may well not raise production capacity high enough or quickly enough, whether for political reasons or because internal decision-making is too slow or the security environment too hostile.

Labels: ,


Monday, August 04, 2008

And you think last winter was bad? 

Last winter was a bad one - that is to say, it was a normal Canadian winter rather than the extended autumns or springs we've been blessed with the last few years. But a according to climate research being done by some German scientists we could have a winter that would be a lot worse -- so bad that one winter could trigger an ice age.
THE last ice age 13,000 years ago took hold in just one year, more than ten times quicker than previously believed, scientists have warned.
Rather than a gradual cooling over a decade, the ice age plunged Europe into the deep freeze, German Research Centre for Geosciences at Potsdam said.

Cold, stormy conditions caused by an abrupt shift in atmospheric circulation froze the continent almost instantly during the Younger Dryas less than 13,000 years ago – a very recent period on a geological scale.

The new findings will add to fears of a serious risk of this happening again in the UK and western Europe – and soon.

Labels: ,


Friday, July 04, 2008

Biofuels creating famine that could lead to pandenic? 

According to an unpublished report by the World Bank, the shift of agriculture from food to biofuels has caused world food prices to rise by 75 percent, pushing more than 100 million people below the poverty line. As Crawford Killian points out in his blog, the countries most affected are also those most suspect to disease and lacking the resources to combat pandemics, should one occur.
Need I note that Bangladesh and Egypt are both hot-zone countries, as are other riot-prone countries like Indonesia and China?

When millions of people have no source of protein besides poultry, and H5N1 breaks out in that poultry, we can't expect that culls will go smoothly. We can't expect that culls will happen at all.

Nor can we expect to drive to work in bio-fuelled cars, listening with a clear conscience to the sad news from Asia and Africa.

Labels: , ,


Saturday, June 21, 2008

A Midest Katrina 

The Big Picture blog, a photography blog published by the Boston Globe, has a series of pictures showing the flooding in the US Midwest, mostly around Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The scope of the flooding rivals that of Hurricane Katrina a few years ago. The story leads off with what is probably the scariest tornado photograph I've ever seen.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Debunking the climate change skeptics 

Here's a page that compiles a list of the arguments commonly used by climate change skeptics and refutes them one by one.
Below is a complete listing of the articles in "How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic," a series by Coby Beck containing responses to the most common skeptical arguments on global warming. There are four separate taxonomies; arguments are divided by:

* Stages of Denial,
* Scientific Topics,
* Types of Argument, and
* Levels of Sophistication.


Each major topic is broken down further with more topics and subtopics; for example: One hundred years is not enough, Glaciers have always grown and receded, Warming is due to the Urban Heat Island effect.

Labels: ,


More on the death of suburbia 

Here's another article on the social impact that high gas prices, and in the US the subprime mortgage crisis, are having on the suburban life style. It seems the American dream of two cars and a house on a big lot in the suburbs is turning into something of a nightmare.
Recent market research indicates that up to 40 percent of households surveyed in selected metropolitan areas want to live in walkable urban areas, said Leinberger. The desire is also substantiated by real estate prices for urban residential space, which are 40 to 200 percent higher than in traditional suburban neighborhoods -- this price variation can be found both in cities and small communities equipped with walkable infrastructure, he said.

The result is an oversupply of depreciating suburban housing and a pent-up demand for walkable urban space, which is unlikely to be met for a number of years. That's mainly, according to Leinberger, because the built environment changes very slowly; and also because governmental policies and zoning laws are largely prohibitive to the construction of complicated high-density developments.

It used to be that condos were an affordable alternative to suburban living. But from what I've seen of prices recently, condos in Toronto at least, are now as expensive or more expensive than many houses. So the trend mentioned in the article may be happening here too.

Labels: ,


Sunday, June 08, 2008

Leave the old economy behind 

There's been a lot of news this week about GM's decision to close its Oshawa truck plant, throwing 2,300 auto workers out of work. It's a nasty turn of events for the workers, but it's something that GM should have done five years ago. If our provincial and federal governments had any sense, they would have made the funding they gave GM contingent on retooling to build new, fuel-efficient automobiles, not the gas guzzling monsters that are now a glut on the market.

In yesterday's Globe and Mail, Margaret Wente wrote about how our industry and governments should be investing in the future:
Something else happened that day, too. Mike Lazaridis, co-inventor of the BlackBerry, pledged another $50-million of his own money for his brainchild, a tiny outfit called the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, just a few dozen miles down the 401 from the doomed GM plant. The news scarcely rated a mention. But why should it? A handful of big brains arguing about Big Bangs simply can't compete with a thousand angry auto workers who've lost their livelihoods.

Mr. Lazaridis is worried about the future, too, but not of union work. He's worried whether we'll have enough brains. "The number of PhDs the Chinese plan to graduate within the next 10 years is greater than the entire population of Canada," he says. He is a tall, soft-spoken man with a shock of snow-white hair. "We can't beat them on scale. We have to do it by smarts. The only way to get ahead of that tsunami is to invest in quality."

Mr. Lazaridis and his team are among the most successful wealth-creators in the world. The company he started, Research in Motion, is the most valuable enterprise in Canada. It's worth nearly $75-billion - around eight times more than all of General Motors. Its products are in demand worldwide, and its prospects look extremely bright. Over the next two years, RIM will hire as many people as GM is laying off just a few miles away


Well, it's more than just a few miles (about a hundred), but the point is valid. We need investments in the future, not in the past. And it's obvious that neither the Canadian or US governments are able to do that (I'm noting here the failure of the US Senate to pass the recent Climate Security act.
To the surprise of no one, the Senate on Friday failed to pass a bill that would have taken the fight against global warming right to the streets and smokestacks of the United States. With a hostile administration in the White House and a group of entrenched Republican lawmakers who still haven't grasped the economic reality that failing to slow climate change will ultimately cost the country far more money than combating it, there was little chance of passage this year. Fortunately, though, the political climate is changing as fast as planet Earth's.

As Wente says to wrap up her article: "RIM's world is our future, and GM's world is our past. But we have a choice. And if we don't get it, we'll be doomed to eating other people's dust."

Labels: ,


Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Could methane trigger runaway greenhouse effect? 

If you think carbon dioxide is an environmental problem, you ain't seen nothin' yet. According to a paper to be published in Nature tomorrow, release of methane frozen in ice and permafrost could cause a runaway greenhouse effect that could leave the Earth ice free in less than a century.
n his study's scenario, methane frozen together with water in what's known as a clathrate (or gas hydrate) became destabilized at lower latitudes and began to release methane gas. The warming this gas induced began a cascade of clathrate destabilization running up towards the poles, acting as a runaway feedback mechanism that rapidly changed the earth's climate from glacial to tropical.

Kennedy chose the period known as the Marinoan deglaciation because he sees parallels from that distant event with the rapid rise in temperatures the Earth is now experiencing due to increased so-called radiative forcing from higher levels of greenhouse gases.

This isn't a new scenario, BTW. I remember this being described in John Barnes' novel, Mother of Storms, more than ten years ago.

Labels: ,


Thursday, May 22, 2008

$200/barrel oil coming? 

According to Sir Richard Branson, oil prices will hit $200/barrel, putting several airlines out of business. I almost laughed when I read the article lead-in, because if oil hits $200/barrel (which wouldn't surprise me), it's going to be hard on a lot more than airlines.
Echoing comments last week by Willie Walsh, chief executive of British Airways, Branson said: "Oil prices will continue to rise due to a combination of global demand and falling reserves. The strong airlines will survive, but one or more major US carriers will go out of business this year."
advertisement

The sentiment was echoed by the aviation analyst Chris Avery, of JP Morgan, who calculates that most of the major European carriers face huge increases to their fuel bills as their hedging positions run out. Avery said BA will have to pay an extra £1bn in fuel costs this year, while Lufthansa will have to find an extra €2bn (£1.6bn) by 2009. Virgin Atlantic's fuel bill is 70pc hedged over the next year.

Note that, according to the Wall Street Journal, oil supplies may be drying up.
The world's premier energy monitor is preparing a sharp downward revision of its oil-supply forecast, a shift that reflects deepening pessimism over whether oil companies can keep abreast of booming demand.

The Paris-based International Energy Agency is in the middle of its first attempt to comprehensively assess the condition of the world's top 400 oil fields. Its findings won't be released until November, but the bottom line is already clear: Future crude supplies could be far tighter than previously thought.

A pessimistic supply outlook from the IEA could further rattle an oil market that already has seen crude prices rocket over $130 a barrel, double what they were a year ago. U.S. benchmark crude broke a record for the fourth day in a row, rising 3.3% Wednesday to close at $133.17 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Labels: , ,


Sunday, May 18, 2008

And you think it's expensive to fill your tank 

If you think it's expensive to fill your tank (it's costing us about $100 now to fill up our van), consider yourself lucky you're not a trucker. At current fuel prices, it can cost a trucker $1,800 to fill a big rig. Given how much gets shipped by truck, that's bound to drive up prices on almost everything. Truck designers are doing what they can to improve fuel efficiency.
The $119,000 Kenworth, marketed as the company's most aerodynamic truck ever, has a streamlined wedge shape and eliminates projections such as the smokestacks. The result, Rethwisch said, is an increase from 4.5 mpg in the Peterbilt to the Kenworth's 6.5 mpg, which saves him upward of $2,000 a month at the pump.

"The Peterbilt is the classiest and coolest-looking truck around," said Rethwisch, who hauls dairy products from Wisconsin to California and goes home loaded with produce. "But cool only goes so far when fuel prices are so high."

If fuel prices stay high (as I expect they will), it'll be interesting to see if the railways, who can ship goods much more efficiently than trucks, enjoy a resurgence of their freight business.

Labels: ,


Monday, March 31, 2008

Photos of American West drying up 

National Geographic has published some striking photos of the drought in the US West. Contrast the pictures of the golf course in the middle of the desert with the drop in the water level of Lake Meade. There's also an accompanying article.

Labels: ,


Thursday, March 06, 2008

Global cooling 

Temperature statistics for the last year indicate that global average temperatures dropped by more than .5 degrees C in 2007. This is something we will want to keep a very close eye on. Coupled with the fact that we are in a very pronouced solar minimum, and it might mean that we are in for another period similar to the Little Ice Age that froze Europe 400 years ago. Some rather more alarmist commentary is on Jerry Pournelle's web site here, with some counterbalancing views here.

Labels:


Saturday, February 23, 2008

Pentagon climate change report suppressed 

The US Exxon Bush administration is up to its usual tricks, suppressing a Pentagon report that warns of the disastrous impacts of climate change, according to an article in Britain's Observer.
A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world.

The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents.

'Disruption and conflict will be endemic features of life,' concludes the Pentagon analysis. 'Once again, warfare would define human life.'

The article goes on to describe a series of administration attempts to suppress evidence that points to climate change, and other tactics, like writing to Tony Blair to complain about comments made by Blair's chief science advisor, and cite's the Bush family's ties to the oil business as one possible motive.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, January 16, 2008

It's the end of the world as we know it 

So you thought we'd go out in a blaze of glory when an asteroid lands in the Pacific, or some drunk US president (or Russian premier) pushes the big red one. But did you ever think of starving to death because all of the bees died? Radar gives you 10 more reasons to worry about how the world might end.
Remember the buzz about killer bees? So do we, fondly. Because it turns out bees are really important, but since late 2006 they've been disappearing for reasons nobody can quite explain. And it's not just honey supplies that will suffer if the bees bite it. You can also kiss your fruits and veggies good-bye. "You could have the perfect field, soil, and sun, and if the pollinator was not there you'd have a vine and no fruit," says Dr. Jeff Pettis, head USDA bee researcher. With honeybees pollinating more than a quarter of the world's food supply, that's a lot of empty vines (and stomachs). The financial impact of a bee-free season would be $75 billion. Perhaps Albert Einstein put it best: "If the bee disappears from the surface of the Earth, man will have no more than four years to live."

Labels:


Sunday, November 25, 2007

Brian Aldiss on what SF missed 

SF author Brian Aldiss has a trenchant essay on how science fiction has missed the boat on climate change.
If only we had called it "climate climax". Climate climax sounds like something worth worrying about when Ban Ki-moon and the UN's latest report call for urgent action. Alas, global warming sounds all too soothing, especially for those living in Skegness.

We have been slow to take up the challenge presented by global warming. This country has its problems: turkeys looking forward to Christmas have been prematurely slaughtered. But there's a wonderful crop of apples, some still on the trees, nestling among the leaves in November. As a nation, the British have always had a problem with how to get agitated. It was one reason for inventing cricket. Imagine if a game of football lasted for five days.

Science fiction writers find difficulty in dealing with the global threat, never mind recycling. There has always been a journalistic flavour to science fiction. If an SF catastrophe happens, it happens right now, and LA goes promptly up in smoke. If aliens from Alpha Centauri invade us five centuries from today - well, that's philosophy, isn't it? They will come to teach us to behave or maybe to wipe us out entirely. To serve us right. We have been so self-indulgent, so foolish, we of the self-promoting homo sapiens species.

We have multiplied beyond our means, just as SF always said. No one took much notice. Except, that is, for Gaia. As James Lovelock has said, Gaia stands for Earth with its rocks, seas and atmosphere, together with all living things: Mother Earth. And mothers won't stand for too much abuse. Mothers can get nasty.

Labels: ,


Monday, November 19, 2007

This is more like it 

A couple of days ago I posted an article about a French train travelling 575 km/hr. Now, here's an article from Saturday's Globe and Mail about the other end of the ride, the renovated St. Pancras train station in London. This Victorian masterpiece was recently renovated to be one end of a high-speed train link to Paris via the Channel tunnel.

To give you an idea of just how serious the British are about train transportation, the station renovation and the high-speed link to the Channel tunnel (about 40 miles), cost $10 billion - yes that's billion with a B. I doubt our government has spent that much money on train transportation since I was born. And they get champagne too -- on the platform. We can only dream.
For those of us raised in the Roman faith, there's nothing strange about mixing wine and church, even before lunch. So, fortified by fizzy, I step onto the 12:30 to Paris, walking past Greenpeace demonstrators who are here to support Eurostar's green initiatives (the trains to the continent are deemed carbon-neutral, a claim verified by Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth). One activist tells me to protest against the construction of the third runway at Heathrow; I tell him that if I never visit Heathrow again, I'll die happy.

“Welcome to an historic journey,” the conductor announces as we roll out of the station and into the heart of Europe's largest engineering project, which has been completed, improbably, on time and on budget. The station renovation and construction of a dedicated high-speed track from London to the Channel Tunnel cost more than $10-billion; the new route shaves 20 minutes off the London-Paris run, bringing it down to two hours and 15 minutes.

Labels: ,


Saturday, October 27, 2007

Great Lakes levels down 

Water levels in the Great Lakes are down again this year - in some cases enough to affect shipping and recreational boating. It's particularly severe in Lake Superior - I know that my family have mentioned that several popular beaches near the Soo are unusable because the water levels have dropped so much.
The picture is just as serious in the upper Great Lakes and is particularly grave in Lake Superior, where water levels have hovered below average since 1998 and, based on provisional data, set record lows in August and September. It is the longest stretch of below-average readings at Lake Superior since the Corps of Engineers started tracking the Great Lakes’ levels in 1918.

On average, 240 million tons of cargo travel across the Great Lakes every year. The United States fleet circulating in the Great Lakes has 63 ships, which have lost a total of 8,000 tons of cargo capacity for every inch of water the lakes have fallen below normal this year, said James H. I. Weakley, president of the carriers’ association. Those 8,000 tons, he said, correspond to enough iron ore to produce 6,000 cars, or enough coal to provide electricity to the Detroit area for three hours, or enough stone to build 24 houses.

Labels:


Tuesday, October 23, 2007

LA wildfires from space 

These two photographs show the extent of the wildfires in Southern California. They were taken three hours apart and the growth is remarkable.

Labels:


Sunday, October 21, 2007

The Future is Drying Up 

The Future is Drying Up is a long, feature article from the New York Times Magazine about the effect that drought and the disappearing mountain snowpack is having on the western US. It's not pretty. Definitely sobering reading.
In the Southwest this past summer, the outlook was equally sobering. A catastrophic reduction in the flow of the Colorado River — which mostly consists of snowmelt from the Rocky Mountains — has always served as a kind of thought experiment for water engineers, a risk situation from the outer edge of their practical imaginations. Some 30 million people depend on that water. A greatly reduced river would wreak chaos in seven states: Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada and California. An almost unfathomable legal morass might well result, with farmers suing the federal government; cities suing cities; states suing states; Indian nations suing state officials; and foreign nations (by treaty, Mexico has a small claim on the river) bringing international law to bear on the United States government. In addition, a lesser Colorado River would almost certainly lead to a considerable amount of economic havoc, as the future water supplies for the West’s industries, agriculture and growing municipalities are threatened. As one prominent Western water official described the possible future to me, if some of the Southwest’s largest reservoirs empty out, the region would experience an apocalypse, “an Armageddon.”

Labels:


Friday, September 21, 2007

The Hydrogen Myth 

Hydrogen is often mentioned as a possible, alternative fuel to gasoline, but as this presentation points out, it's not going to happen any time soon, if ever. (Select the PDF named "The Hydrogen Myth").

There are some other presentations linked on this page that should be worth checking out.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Katrina's second anniversary 

On the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina drowning New Orleans and devasting the Gulf Coast, it's pretty clear that New Orleans is still at risk from a major hurricane.

There's more on Katrina on Dr. Jeff Masters' blog, including links to Margie Kieper's Katrina's Storm Surge series, which is the best overall analysis of Katrina and its damage that I've seen anywhere. And then there's Mike Theiss' post about how he rode out Katrina in a Gulf coast hotel, with some truly amazing photos.

Labels: ,


Sunday, August 26, 2007

In Nature's Casino 

Today's New York Times Magazine has a very long and completely fascinating article about how the insurance industry and the financial markets handle extreme but unlikely risk -- the type of risk posed by storms like Hurricane Katrina.
Intuitively what the market was doing made sense. Highly improbable events were especially unsettling. The person who insured others against an unlikely event faced not only the problem of judging its likelihood; even if he knew how often it would occur, he didn’t know when it would occur. Even if you had complete certainty that a U.S. stock-market crash happened just once every 25 years, you still didn’t know which year. If you had set up a business to sell crash insurance in January 1987, you would have been bankrupted by the crash in October; on the other hand, if you had gone into the business in 1988, you would have gotten rich. There was no justice in it. The catastrophic risk-taker was a bit like a card counter at the blackjack table allowed to play only a few hands: yes, the odds are in his favor, but he doesn’t always get to play long enough for the odds to determine the outcome.

Labels: ,


Friday, August 10, 2007

Arctic ice melting faster than ever 

It appears that Arctic ice is melting faster than ever before. This could have major effects on North American climate if it continues.
This July's major loss of sea ice will amplify sea ice loss the remainder of the summer, due to a positive feedback loop. As sea ice melts in response to rising temperatures, more of the dark ocean is exposed, allowing it to absorb more of the sun's energy. This further increases air temperatures, ocean temperatures, and ice melt in a process know as the "ice-albedo feedback" (albedo means how much sunlight a surface reflects). The July 2007 ice loss may mean that a runaway "ice-albedo feedback" has taken hold, which will amplify until the Arctic Ocean is entirely ice-free later this century. Other scientists will disagree, but I believe that such a runaway ice-albedo feedback has taken hold.

The melting of the Arctic sea ice will not raise ocean levels appreciably, since the ice is already floating in the ocean. However, it will bring warmer temperatures to the Arctic, which will accelerate the melting of the Greenland Ice Cap. This ice sheet holds enough water to raise sea level 20 feet--though much less melting is expected this century, with only a 0.6-1.9 foot sea level rise predicted. Loss of Arctic sea ice will also dramatically change the global weather and precipitation patterns. For example, the jet stream should move further north, bringing more precipitation to the Arctic, and more frequent droughts over the U.S. In any case, the reduced Artic sea ice should give us another delayed start to winter in the Northern Hemisphere this year.

Labels:


Monday, August 06, 2007

New Orleans two years after Katrina 

Time Magazine has published a long article looking at the state of flood control in New Orleans two years after Hurricane Katrina. Unfortunately for the city and people living there, it looks like the flood control efforts are turning into yet another Army Corps of Engineers fiasco.
The most important thing to remember about the drowning of New Orleans is that it wasn't a natural disaster. It was a man-made disaster, created by lousy engineering, misplaced priorities and pork-barrel politics. Katrina was not the Category 5 killer the Big Easy had always feared; it was a Category 3 storm that missed New Orleans, where it was at worst a weak 2. The city's defenses should have withstood its surges, and if they had we never would have seen the squalor in the Superdome, the desperation on the rooftops, the shocking tableau of the Mardi Gras city underwater for weeks. We never would have heard the comment "Heckuva job, Brownie." The Federal Emergency Management Agency (fema) was the scapegoat, but the real culprit was the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which bungled the levees that formed the city's man-made defenses and ravaged the wetlands that once formed its natural defenses. Americans were outraged by the government's response, but they still haven't come to grips with the government's responsibility for the catastrophe.

They should. Two years after Katrina, the effort to protect coastal Louisiana from storms and restore its vanishing wetlands has become one of the biggest government extravaganzas since the moon mission—and the Army Corps is running the show, with more money and power than ever. Many of the same coastal scientists and engineers who sounded alarms about the vulnerability of New Orleans long before Katrina are warning that the Army Corps is poised to repeat its mistakes—and extend them along the entire Louisiana coast. If you liked Katrina, they say, you'll love what's coming next.

Labels: , ,


Monday, July 30, 2007

Max Mayfield's Hurricane Blog 

Max Mayfield, former director of the National Hurricane Center, now has a blog. If you live anywhere on the East or Gulf coasts, this should be a must read. And if you can find an RSS feed link for it, please let me know where it is.

Labels:


Thursday, July 05, 2007

Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson 

Wired has an interview with SF author Kim Stanley Robinson, author of the Mars trilogy (Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars) and a his current trilogy, 40 Days of Rain, 50 Degrees Below, and Sixty Days and Counting, which is about climate change and what we can do about it. I've read the first two books and enjoyed them, though I don't think they're his best work.
We only have one planet to experiment with, and unexpected side effects and the consequences of these actions on a massive scale are so hard to predict. In the new trilogy, the big projects they do -- particularly the release of the engineered lichen -- are incredibly dangerous and unadvisable. What I wanted to suggest is that if things got desperate enough, there are governments that could decide to do things on their own and not wait for the rest of the world to approve. That could get bad.

In terms of geo-engineering, there's hardly a single project I think would be advisable. But if we fail to decarbonize, and it's 5 or 7 degrees hotter in 2050, there will be scientists and engineers saying they can fix it all with a silver bullet. And then the idea will be on the table.

If you pour salt in the North Atlantic because it's gotten too fresh and stalled the Gulf Stream, as in my book, then you're doing something relatively benign and un-dangerous. Salt would quickly diffuse; it wouldn't change much in the environment. It would be an attempt at remediation.

Labels: ,


Sunday, July 01, 2007

Urban sprawl down south 

The GTA (Greater Toronto Area) is notorious for urban sprawl -- development has run rampant over some of the best farmland in Canada. We're not the only ones with that problem though, as this Wunderground blog post about Florida shows.

Labels:


Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Is global warming due to the sun? 

I've seen several reports over the past few months purporting to show that global warming may be caused by changes in the solar constant, citing as evidence warming of other bodies in the solar system, such as Mars, Jupiter, Neptune, and Pluto. This has been taken up by people who want to believe that carbon dioxide (read human pollution of the biosphere) isn't a factor and we can go on burning all the fossil fuels we want because it's the sun that's frying us.

The Bad Astronomy blog has a post that pretty much demolishes these claims.
When I look at all of this, I see a handful of the 100 large solar system bodies showing some evidence of local warming (Jupiter’s spot), some evidence of systemic warming with known causes that are a lot more likely than the Sun heating up (like well-understood orbital variations), and some evidence that any warming experienced by these bodies is possibly being exaggerated in the reporting.

I also see cherry-picking, with no mention of the other planets and moons in the solar system.

Labels: ,


Sunday, June 17, 2007

Hurricane centre director being muzzled 

Bill Proenza, the outspoken director of the National Hurricane Center is being muzzled by the Bush administration for doing his job -- trying to make sure he has the resources to forecast hurricanes accurately.
In recent interviews with The Miami Herald and other media, Proenza has strongly criticized leaders of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for spending millions of dollars on a public-relations campaign when hurricane forecasters deal with budget shortfalls.

One of his main concerns has been the imminent demise of a key weather satellite called QuikScat, launched in 1999 and long past its designed lifetime.

No replacement currently is in development and the loss of QuikScat could diminish the accuracy of some hurricane forecasts by up to 16 percent, Proenza and other experts have said. …

This is more than a question of academic interest. Peoples' lives are at stake here.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, May 15, 2007

The case for solar power satellites 

Space review has a good article making the case for solar power satellites, something that Jerry Pournelle and other SF writers have been advocating for decades.
Solar power from both the Moon and from satellites would provide energy for operations in space and could be beamed down to Earth using either lasers or microwaves. The great advantage of beamed power is that it does not have to be transmitted across the giant transcontinental grids as it done today. Multiple solar power satellites, along with a large set of arrays on the Moon, would be the basis of a system that would be far more robust and reliable than our current one, which suffers from occasional blackouts such as the one suffered along the US East Coast in August 2003, or the terrorist campaign that is being carried out today against the Iraqi electricity grid.

Labels: ,


Sunday, May 06, 2007

Canned heat 

Here's a solar heater built from pop cans. I guess small-scale solar doesn't have to be expensive.

Labels: ,


Friday, May 04, 2007

Pollution worse than hurricanes 

There's an interesting post on Dr. Jeff Masters' blog today, comparing the death toll caused by hurricanes with that caused by high-pressure systems. High-pressure systems generally bring warm sunny weather, but they can also cause temperature inversions, which trap smog. This has been particularly noticeable in southern Ontario over the last few years. It's hard to quantify the smog's death toll, but studies indicate that it increases the death rate by about .5 percent. Given the population of our large urban centres, that translates to tens of thousands of deaths.

It's also worth noting that measures intended to curb global warming and reduce the amount of CO2 we put in the atmosphere will likely reduce the microparticulates that cause the most lung damage.

Labels:


Sunday, April 15, 2007

Climate change could spark Canada-US tensions 

New Scientist has an article discussing the latest reports on climate change, which idicate that there could be severe water shortages and drought in the midwest. Increasing demand for water could also increase tensions between the US and Canada.
think I was first struck by the potential impact of climate change when a US climate scientist I met at a conference told me he had bought a house in Canada "because it makes good financial sense: that's where the water will be".

At the time, the fact that someone close to the latest developments in climate science should make financial decisions based on climate change was a pretty convincing argument.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Earthquake raised island 10 feet 

The magitude 8.0 earthquake that struck the Solomon islands last week raised one of the islands by 10 feet, leaving coral reefs exposed and dying.
The seismic jolt that unleashed the deadly Solomons tsunami this week lifted an entire island metres out of the sea, destroying some of the world's most pristine coral reefs.

In an instant, the grinding of the Earth's tectonic plates in the 8.0 magnitude earthquake Monday forced the island of Ranongga up three metres (10 foot).

Submerged reefs that once attracted scuba divers from around the globe lie exposed and dying after the quake raised the mountainous landmass, which is 32-kilometres (20-miles) long and 8-kilometres (5-miles) wide.

Corals that used to form an underwater wonderland of iridescent blues, greens and reds now bleach under the sun, transforming into a barren moonscape surrounding the island.

The stench of rotting fish and other marine life stranded on the reefs when the seas receded is overwhelming and the once vibrant coral is dry and crunches underfoot.


Update: National Geographic has an article with some pictures. Pretty amazing, and not very good for the islanders whose fishing and diving sites are likely ruined.

Labels:


Saturday, April 07, 2007

Mars IS warming, but it's not the Sun doing it 

There's been some talk among skeptics of human-caused global warming that the observed warming of Mars (.65C over the last few decades) means that the heating is caused by variations in solar radiation. According to a paper published by Nature, there's a simpler explanation that doesn't involve the Sun.
Lori Fenton at the Carl Sagan Center, Mountain View, California, and colleagues looked at maps of Mars's 'albedo', a measure of how much light reflects off a surface. By comparing a map from 1976-78 with one from 1999-2000, they found "some pretty dramatic changes", says Fenton. In particular, the southern highlands region of Mars had darkened significantly.

The darkening is thanks to the clearance of light-coloured dust that covers the planet's darker bedrock, they propose. When the Sun's light hits dark rock it warms the surface, and the heat is kept in by the atmosphere. This warming kicks up winds, which swirl any dust around and can even make dust devils. This sweeps the light-coloured dust into pockets, revealing more bedrock and causing further heating.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Could be a bad hurricane season 

The latest forecasts are indicating that this year could be a more active than normal hurricane season in the Atlantic, with a good chance that a major hurricane will hit the US Gulf or East coasts. Dr. Jeff Masters has a good overview of the forecast.

However, before you sell off your Florida beach condo, keep in mind that the April hurricane forecasts aren't terribly accurate. The one issued at the beginning of June will be the one to watch, and worry about if it matches this one.

Labels:


Saturday, March 24, 2007

Katrina report blasts Army Corps of Engineers 

The Louisiana State Department of Transportation and Development has issued a report that largely blames the Army Corps of Engineers for the catastropic flooding of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. The report says that the levee system was "managed like a circa 1965 flood control museum", that the levees were too low because the Corps didn't take into account the subsidence of the land in New Orleans, and that the system should have been beefed up for stronger storms than it was originally designed. Read more about the report on Jeff Masters' blog.

Labels: ,


Thursday, March 22, 2007

Storm Warning 

On May 3, 1999 the strongest tornado ever recorded struck the southern suburbs of Oklahoma City. The F5 monster was more than a mile across. Storm Warning is the story of that tornado, and a history of tornado science as well. There's a review of it on Dr. Jeff Masters blog, and you can read the introductory chapter on the book's web site. I recommend you do so; it's a gripping story, and well-written too.
Before the greenish radar scans, before blurry photographs from atellites, before television or television meteorologists, and before the snappy twenty-fourhour-a-day Weather Channel, there was this: the faint flicker of lightning and the distant growl of thunder on the prairie’s horizon. This was what amounted to a storm warning on the plains.

The far, open sky filled with mountainous cauliflower clouds that grew fat with rain and hail, and those dark olive-hued clouds could conceal the most powerful force known in nature—or not. No one knew for sure, no mere mortal could; after all, the tornado, or cyclone as it was called on the plains, was an act of God, an Old testament punishment for ill deeds or a test of faith. It was capricious and deadly, leaving the living to bear witness that the great wind came straight from heaven, or so it seemed.

Labels: , ,


Monday, March 12, 2007

Next climate report predicts water shortages 

The next report to be issued in April by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts widespread water shortages by the end of the century.
The draft report says that hundreds of millions of Africans and tens of millions of Latin Americans who now have water will be short of it in less than 20 years. By 2050, more than a billion people in Asia could face water shortages. By 2080, water shortages could threaten 1.1 billion to 3.2 billion people, depending on the level of greenhouse gases that cars and industry spew into the air.

It says that death rates for the world’s poor from conditions worsened by the changes global warming brings, like malnutrition and diarrhea, will rise by 2030. By 2080, 200 million to 600 million people could be hungry because of global warming’s effects, it says.

Labels:


Sunday, March 11, 2007

A neat walk 

Spring is definitely in the air, as are the geese. Nancy and I went for a walk this evening and saw the largest flocks of geese we've ever seen, giant Vs heading in from the north to the lake. There must have been thousands of them. They were off in the distance, so I couldn't see individual geese, other than the odd straglers that came overhead, but there was certainly a huge number.

Then Nancy saw a really bright meteor, a fireball. I missed it; I wasn't looking in the right direction when it happened, but another lady on the street saw it too and asked us what it was. I saw something similar in the Soo some years back - it's pretty rare to see one that bright.

All in all, a good walk.

Labels:


Bush administration muzzling climate scientists - again 

The Bush admistration is still trying to muzzle its climate scientists - now it's telling them not to discuss climate change, polar bears, or sea ice.
“Please be advised that all foreign travel requests (SF 1175 requests) and any future travel requests involving or potentially involving climate change, sea ice and/or polar bears will also require a memorandum from the regional director to the director indicating who’ll be the official spokesman on the trip and the one responding to questions on these issues, particularly polar bears.”

The sample memorandums, described as to be used in writing travel requests, indicate that the employee seeking permission to travel “understands the administration’s position on climate change, polar bears, and sea ice and will not be speaking on or responding to these issues.”

Labels: ,


Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Bruce Sterling on the dot-green future 

SF author and futurist, Bruce Sterling, has an op-ed piece in the Washington Post in which he discusses what he calls the dot-green future.
Wall Street investment tycoon Henry Kravis, the original "Barbarian at the Gate," is buying into Texas coal plants so they won't exist. The great and the good at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, were corporate green all the way. Austin has proclaimed itself the world capital of the war on climate change. Britain's Stern Report on the economics of climate change proves that it's cheaper to run a world than to wreck it. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has figured out that a climate crisis is as scary as a nuclear exchange. And there is an absolute explosion of trendy green design Web logs, of which mine, Viridiandesign.org, was one of the first.

Labels: ,


Monday, February 19, 2007

Tropical glaciers melting too 

Global warming is hitting the arctic and antarctic regions harder than other parts of the planet, but it is affecting the tropics too. The worlds largest tropical glacier, in Peru, is rapidly diappearing.
Ohio State glaciologist Lonnie Thompson and a team of scientists said they have found evidence the Qori Kalis glacier of the Quelccaya ice cap in the Peruvian Andes could lose half its mass in 12 months and could be gone five years from now.

The Quelccaya ice cap covers 44 square kilometres in the Cordillera Oriental region and is the world's largest tropical ice mass. Its biggest glacier, the Qori Kalis, has receded by at least 1.1 kilometres since 1963, when the first formal measurements were taken. The rate of retreat has increased from six metres per year between 1963 and 1978 to 60 metres per year now, said Thompson.

Labels: ,


Saturday, January 20, 2007

Boss Hog 

Rolling Stone has a long article about Smithfield Foods, the largest pork producer in the US. They're also one of the largest polluters in the US, as the article makes graphically and nauseatingly clear. You may decide to stop eating pork after reading this article.
Smithfield Foods, the largest and most profitable pork processor in the world, killed 27 million hogs last year. That's a number worth considering. A slaughter-weight hog is fifty percent heavier than a person. The logistical challenge of processing that many pigs each year is roughly equivalent to butchering and boxing the entire human populations of New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia, Phoenix, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, San Jose, Detroit, Indianapolis, Jacksonville, San Francisco, Columbus, Austin, Memphis, Baltimore, Fort Worth, Charlotte, El Paso, Milwaukee, Seattle, Boston, Denver, Louisville, Washington, D.C., Nashville, Las Vegas, Portland, Oklahoma City and Tucson.

Smithfield Foods actually faces a more difficult task than transmogrifying the populations of America's thirty-two largest cities into edible packages of meat. Hogs produce three times more excrement than human beings do. The 500,000 pigs at a single Smithfield subsidiary in Utah generate more fecal matter each year than the 1.5 million inhabitants of Manhattan. The best estimates put Smithfield's total waste discharge at 26 million tons a year. That would fill four Yankee Stadiums. Even when divided among the many small pig production units that surround the company's slaughterhouses, that is not a containable amount.

Labels: ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?