Sunday, February 28, 2010

HotDocs Doc Library 

HotDocs is an annual festival of the best Canadian documentaries. They have now set up an an online library with hundreds of documentaries. The site is nicely set up, with a choice of HTML or Flash interface. You can browse or choose categories with pre-set playlists, although there doesn't appear to be a search function for the site.

Canada has a long and rich documentary film tradition and it's great to see this library being made available for everyone.

Labels:


Saturday, February 27, 2010

Max Headroom coming to DVD, finally! 

This is great news. The seminal British cyberpunk TV series, Max Headroom, will finally get a DVD release.

“Max Headroom” starred Matt Frewer as a reporter whose mind is downloaded into a computer to create a virtual clone who exists in the digital world. Amanda Pays, Jeffrey Tambor and W. Morgan Sheppard also star in the series, which ran for 14 episodes on Cinemax and ABC in 1987 and 1988. Set in the near future, “Max Headroom” depicted a world of television run amok.

Shout! Factory has a “Max Headroom” complete-series DVD set slated for August, according to a spokesperson. Episodes are being transferred from their original elements to provide the best quality, and Shout! Factory is planning a robust range of extras for the set. Bonus content may include the original U.K. telefilm 20 Minutes Into the Future, upon which the series is based, though nothing has been confirmed. Max Headroom also appeared in a series of Coca-Cola commercials in the 1980s, raising speculation such content may also be fodder for bonus material, but Shout! Factory said planning the extras is in the early stage.


I am most definitely going to buy this as soon as I can get my hot little hands on it. I loved this show when it was originally broadcast and I can't wait to see it again.

Labels: ,


Thursday, February 18, 2010

Nothing is real 

Watching special effects production reels is always interesting, and especially now with the really advanced digital technology available to TV and film directors. The phrase "nothing is real" crops up in more than one Beatles song, but I doubt that they were thinking of the type of visual fakery shown in this Stargate Studios Virtual Backlot reel. It is truly mind blowing.

Labels: , , ,


Wednesday, February 03, 2010

Yet another take on Dune 

It looks like the third attempt to film Frank Herbert's Dune is still in production, albeit with a new director, Pierre Morel. He claims to want to make a movie that's closer to Herbert's original vision, which would be just fine with me.
"Everybody now who reads Dune reads it with David Lynch's images in mind," he said. "So we have to get away from that. It's not a remake of David Lynch's movie. We're doing a re-reading, a brand new approach on the book, a very true approach to the book, the original material. So we will have to deal with trying to erase the image that David Lynch did so we can propose our image.".

Labels: ,


Saturday, January 23, 2010

1945A 

Although there are a lot of alternate history stories and novels, there aren't very many films. 1945A is a short (6 minute) film by Ryan Nagata in which the Nazis come up with some futuristic new weapons. I'd love to see this expanded into a full-length film, a la Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, January 20, 2010

22 minute doc on Avatar 

Here's a 22-minute long documentary about the making of James Cameron's Avatar. It's basically the type of thing you'll find added to a rental DVD, but about halfway through it starts to get into the revolutionary technology that Cameron and his team developed to make the movie - and believe me, it is revolutionary, at least as much as Lucas' motion-capture cameras for Star Wars were in 1977.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, January 06, 2010

20 SF movies to look forward to this year 

io9 has put together a list of 20 SF movies that we can look forward to seeing this year. 2009 was a good year for SF film (Iron Man, District 9, Avatar) - by comparison, I don't see a lot of the list that grabs me. But with new movies by Christopher Nolan and Peter Jackson, I'll keep an open mind.

Labels: ,


Saturday, January 02, 2010

Thoughts on Avatar 

Centuari Dreams has published a two-part article that examines the worldbuilding of Avatar in great detail. Avatar: Vision or Mere Entertainment and Avatar: Plausibility and Implications. It's one of the best articles about Avatar that I've seen and looks at it from a somewhat different and much more scientifically rigorous perspective than the standard movie review.
As we have seen with our own Jovian planets since the days of the twin Voyager space probes, gas giant worlds do have retinues of large and dynamic moons, some of which may be homes for simple organisms. There is no reason not to think that alien gas giants might have exotic companions as well, though whether they would be like the residents of Pandora is much too early to say.

On the subject of living on the moon of a gas giant planet: Note how huge Polyphemus looms in the skies of Pandora as we are witness to throughout the film. It is certainly a very awe-inspiring and aesthetically pleasing image, enhancing the alienness of the moon and its inhabitants. However, I would think that being so close to a gas giant would cause all sorts of geological turmoil, which in turn would greatly upset the balance of life on Pandora, perhaps even to keep it from becoming complex.

To use a real-world example, note how the closest of Jupiter’s four Galilean moons, Io, is constantly pulled and churned about by the great mass of Jupiter and its fellow Galileans to the point where the moon is constantly spewing colorful sulfur across its uncratered surface. Despite the intense nature of Io’s environment, some scientists have speculated that the very geological processes that make Io such a violent place could bring about and support some kind of life, though probably nothing as complex as the creatures on Cameron’s alien moon.

Labels: ,


Thursday, December 31, 2009

Best SF movies of the decade 

John Scalzi has come up with his list of the best science fiction movies of the decade. It's a pretty good list - offhand, I can't think of any movies that shouldn't be on it, though there might be a couple that should. I was surprised that the list didn't include the Lord of the Rings trilogy, but in looking at the list, it seems he's restricted it to movies that are (at least technically) science fiction - it is a fuzzy distinction.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Avatar 

We saw James Cameron's Avatar in 3D this afternoon. It was an amazing experience. I don't think I've ever seen a movie that gave me as many goosebumps. Whatever you've read about how visually stunning Avatar is - well, it's true. And it's not just that it's flashy, or that the CGI is incredibly well done - it takes CGI and 3D to a whole new level. You feel completely immersed in the world.

Yes, the plot is clichéd (think Disney's Poccohantas or Dances With Wolves), and the aliens are much too much like Native Americans, but none of that matters while watching the movie. The theatre we were watching it in was almost full, and it was quiet - I can't think of the last time I was in a movie and heard that level of silence from an audience - we were spellbound.

I suppose I could wish that Cameron had spent some of the millions of his production budget on hiring a good SF writer as a consultant (Unobtanium? Come on people - that was old in the 1930s). But you know what - if I get the chance I'm going back to see it again. And I won't be the only one.

Labels: ,


Thursday, December 24, 2009

Best SF movies of 2009 

John Scalzi weighs in with his list of the best SF movies of 2009. His top pick is Avatar, a movie I hope to see over the holidays. Out of the movies I have seen, I'd probably pick District 9, which we watched again last night and enjoyed as much the second time as the first.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Interview with Terry Gilliam 

On the eve of the release of his latest movie, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, Mother Jones has published a long interview with director Terry Gilliam. I'm looking forward to seeing this, not because of Heath Ledger, but because Gilliam is one of my favourite directors. His last few movies have been spotty, but there's always something worth watching in them, which is more than I can say for a lot of movies these days.
MJ: Heath Ledger's character, Tony, shows Parnassus that ideas aren't enough; you have to sell them, too. Is that the part of moviemaking you find frustrating?

TG: No matter what I've done in the past, and no matter how much all the people who are in charge of the money say they love it, the new project is invariably not the thing they want to do.

MJ: It seems like you're always struggling to raise enough money.

TG: But everybody is. I just seem to have gotten the job of being the one who has to mouth off about how difficult it is all the time, and I’m really kind of bored with that job.

MJ: I suppose too much money is also a curse.

TG: Oh, yeah. The more money you have to work with, the more people you have to deal with that you probably don't want to be spending time dealing with. Munchausen and Brothers Grimm were both very big projects, and things get out of control; you're running an army, and it's harder to control the money. Invariably, what I'm trying to do is more ambitious than the budget, but we manage to do it somehow.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, November 17, 2009

2012 hokum 

It's pretty hard to avoid some of the hype that's been floating around the release of the disaster movie, 2012. Heck, even the Discovery channel, which should know better, has had a commercial about the Mayan calendar predicting the end of the world in 2012. Of course, it's all bunk. Mark Dery shreds it in this article.
Much of the 2012 shtick is a light-fingered (if leaden-humored) rip-off of the late rave-culture philosopher Terence McKenna’s stand-up routine, without McKenna’s prodigious erudition, effortless eloquence, or arch wit, and Pinchbeck is no exception. For Quetzalcoatl’s sake, if you’re going to start a religion, at least invent your own cosmology. Even L. Ron Hubbard was canny enough to concoct a pulp theology for ham-radio enthusiasts out of leftover SF plots. But every time I see Pinchbeck’s glum mug, regarding the world with a sort of forced bliss, I think: Would you buy a used eschaton from this man? (McKenna, by the way, knew which side his ectoplasm was buttered on. When I asked him, over dinner, why a man of his obvious intellectual nimbleness endured the saucer abductees and trance-channelers who plucked at his sleeve at New Age seminars, he rolled a knowing eye and replied, I thought wearily, that he owed his daily crust to “menopausal mystics” and thus had to suffer them, if not gladly.)

And no, I haven't seen the movie yet, though I probably will go just because I'm an effects junkie.

Labels: ,


Sunday, November 15, 2009

Canada's TV war explained 

Canadian broadcasters and the cable/satellite companies have been squaring off the last few months, both launching campaigns to try to persuade viewers that they deserve more money. The broadcasters figure that the cable/satellite companies should pay them for "stealing" their signals and rebroadcasting them, while the cable/satellite companies are complaining that we're already paying the broadcaters to produce content. And we, the poor viewers , are caught in the middle while both try to pick our pockets.

The Writers Guild of Canada has produced a video that tries to explain the situation. It's short and to the point. If you're getting confused and annoyed by the blitz of competing attack ads on TV, watch it.

Labels: ,


Thursday, October 22, 2009

NFB iPhone app is cool 

Canada's National Film Board is one of the nation's great cultural treasures, the producer of many classic (and often Academy Award winning) short films, cartoonsm documentaries, and feature films.

If you have an iPhone or iPod Touch, you can download a free application that will let you view the entire NFB catalog. It sure beats watching most of the crap on YouTube!
All the films stream from the internet, so you'll need an internet connection to grab them, but this app also allows you to download and store films to watch later (up to 24hrs), which is fabulous for those places around town where signal is weak or non-existent—like the 3rd floor bathroom in your office, or the spotty signal you get while riding the train.

The content includes everything from children's cartoons to Oscar-winning flicks, and to top it all off, the download and the entire contents of their film library are free of charge.

Labels:


Monday, October 12, 2009

Review of Moore's "Capitalism: A Love Story" 

Naked Capitalism has posted a review of Michael Moore's Capitalism, A Story that's worth reading.
Readers will likely enjoy his treatment of the TARP and its aftermath. Moore provides evidence well known to finance blog readers, such as Goldman penetration of key policy positions, an obligatory Phil Gramm saying something heinous shot, and the role of financial services contributions (he managed to interview the fellow at Countrywide in charge of the “Friends of Angelo” cheap mortgage as bribe program, who sees nothing wrong in what he did). He also makes good use of Bill Black and Elizabeth Warren. Congressmen and women, agitated even now, describe how the process of getting the TARP through despite overwhelming popular opposition was masterfully orchestrated, carefully timed to prey on re-election fears “like an intelligence operation”. The clips are simply damning, and dispel any doubts of who is really in charge in DC.

And if you read the review, definitely read or watch the linked Bill Moyers interview. It would be interesting to see a graph comparing the decline of the manufacturing sector in the US, the increasing disparity of wealth between rich and poor, and the rise of the financial sector. I'd like to see that correlation graphed.

Labels: , ,


Wednesday, September 30, 2009

John Scalzi on being a creative consultant for SGU 

Stargate Uninverse (SGU), starts Friday night, and I'm very much looking forward to seeing it. One reason is that SF writer John Scalzi is the creative consultant got the this show. In this post, he talks about his role on the show in quite a bit of detail. It's pretty interesting.
To give you a very small example: bullets. The characters come into the ship with a certain number of bullets. It is very difficult for them to get any more of them. So I count the scenes where bullets are used and I send notes that say “now, you know you have that many fewer bullets now, right?” The point is not just to be OCD anal (although there is value in that in this case), but to remind everyone that realism is something we’re looking for, and the choices we make now will have an influence later. So what the producers and writers have to do is to decide whether they want to spend their bullets now, or find some other, non-bullet-related way to solve a particular problem. Sometimes you need a bullet, sometimes you don’t.

Labels: ,


Sunday, September 27, 2009

Interview with Surrogates creator 

We went to see Surrogates last night, a new movie starring Bruce Willis (who was quite good, actually) based on the graphic novel by Robert Venditti. It's a better than average SF action flick with some interesting ideas. The basic idea is pretty interesting, although my willing suspension of disbelief was stretched to the breaking point in a few places. IO9 has an interview with Robert Venditti that explains quite a bit about the background of the comic that became the movie.
As far as writing The Surrogates, again when I was in grad school, we read a book called The Cyber Gypsies, which was a non-fiction book where a guy had spent a lot of time with people addicted to online games, and these people in the book had become so identified with the personas on their computers that they'd lose their jobs or get divorced or any number of things because they were devoting so much of their time to maintaining that persona that they were neglecting the basic steps of living. It was an idea that stuck with me, this basic human desire to be someone other than who we actually are. It just clicked for me in 2002: What if there was a technology that would allow you to create a persona that, instead of being bound in a machine or have a virtual reality situation, what if the technology was reversed and the machine would go out into the world and do all the things you need to do to live for you? You could be that persona all the time and still maintain all your responsibilities.

Labels: , ,


Saturday, September 26, 2009

Thoughtful review of District 9 

It's been a couple of months since I've seen District 9, certainly the best movie I saw this summer, but one that has some flaws that keep it from being truly great. Abigail Nussbaum has just seen it, and has written a long thoughtful review that looks at both the films good points and its flaws.
So how, in the end, to sum up District 9? On one level, the complaints I've listed here seem almost petty when one considers what the standard of storytelling and political commentary is in most effect-laden science fiction films. The simple fact that it didn't use a genocide as a means of developing a main character puts District 9 leagues ahead of Star Trek, which in turn makes it the most sophisticated and morally complex film to come out of this year's blockbuster season (not that that's not a sad commentary in itself). On the other hand, the very fact that District 9 aspires to something beyond the Star Trek-Transformers 2 axis means that it should be judged by harsher standards, and by those it is quite wanting--I haven't even touched on the film's treatment of race within humans, though I was appalled by its depiction of the Nigerian characters, a nameless mass of mobsters, pimps and cannibals. Once again, I find myself uncertain about the film--is it more laudable, or more regrettable? I hope that District 9 and its success are an indication that other filmmakers are going to make science fiction films with loftier goals than the ones we've become accustomed to, but I also hope that they are more successful than Neill Blomkamp at achieving them.

Labels: ,


Thursday, September 24, 2009

FlashForward worth watching 

I'm not a big fan of network TV SF shows, but every once in a while they come up with a good one, and it looks like ABC's FastForward will be worth watching. Based on Robert J. Saywer's 1999 novel, it tells the story of what happens when everyone in the world has a vision of what will happen to them six months in the future. The first episode was fast paced, occasionally eerie, and adequately acted. If they develop some of the ideas tossed off in the first episode, this could be a seriously interesting show.

Here's a review from Wired - they liked it too.

Incidentally, I haven't read the novel. I had a copy and somehow managed to lose it. (It's probably buried in dust bunnies in a dark corner somewhere, who knows). I'll have to snag a copy and see how Rob's original idea compares with the TV show.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Complete Guide to fall SF TV 

io9 has put together a guide to the SF shows in the upcoming fall TV season. Generally, they look pretty uninspiring (like, a remake of V!), but there are a couple I'm looking forward to - Flashpoint, based on Rob Sawyer's novel, and Stargate Universe. There are preview clips in the article.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, August 19, 2009

District 9 is stunning 

I just got back from seeing District 9. I was completely blown away by the film. I've seen enough reviews and articles about it to expect something good, but I wasn't prepared for the movie's immersiveness, intensity, and the quality of the performances. I'm trying to think of the last time I was this impressed by an SF film, and I'm having a hard time coming up with an answer - perhaps the Lord of the Rings trilogy, and I might even have to go farther back than that.

District 9 is gritty, powerful, and gripping - it kept me on the edge of my seat for pretty much the entire movie. It's one of those movies that works on multiple levels - you can appreciate it as an SF film, a thriller, a political allegory, or a movie about a man thrust into an impossible situation. And it's even more remarkable as a first movie from a previously unknown director. It's unquestionably one of the best SF movies in years, and the best movie of any genre I've seen so far this year.

Don't miss it.

Labels: ,


Saturday, August 15, 2009

Interview with District 9 director 

Cinenatical interviews Neil Blomkamp, the director of the new SF movie, District 9. It's been getting very good reviews so far, and looks like it could be a hit. It'd be nice to see a (relatively) low budget, SF movie, that's more than halfway intelligent come out of the blue and be a box office smash. I'll probably have to wait until next week to see it, but I am really looking forward to it.
Cinematical: How difficult or easy was it to juggle the film's thematic elements and still maintain the sense of a compelling story?

Blomkamp: Well if you have a clear enough idea in your mind [and] if you can boil the essence of what the film is down in your mind to, even if it's an emotion that's in me or something I can relate to on a very basic level, because a lot of how I operate is all based on instinct. It's like I can't verbalize a lot of it, it just has to feel right, which I guess is how directors all sort of operate. So when you're going about the action sequences and the flow of the story, like when I was writing it with Terri [Tatchell], I kind of made sure that whatever that natural feeling that felt like I was getting to the essence of what this film was meant to be, if I felt that in the way that I was approaching the action, it meant that whatever the core ideas are, of which I have some in my head, it meant that I was getting close to it. And, if you just do action for the sake of action, and you don't reinforce what the basic emotional core of the film is, then it's meaningless. So at the end, it's really a story of redemption, and hopefully it should be about the guy who made wrong decisions in his life and been an indirect racist, is laying waste to this group that has been oppressing another group for a whole bunch of years. So hopefully it works on an emotional level first.

Labels: ,


Sunday, August 09, 2009

The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus 

Here's the first full trailer for Terry Gilliam's new movie, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus. It is, sadly, Heath Ledger's last movie, and it looks incredible.

Labels: ,


Friday, August 07, 2009

Hugo noninees as movies 

John Scalzi discusses this year's Hugo nominees for best novel and whether they could be made into movies. (He abstains from talking about his own book, Zoe's tale). Of the other four, probably both the Gaiman and Doctorow novels would make good movies, but the one I'd like to see most is Neal Stephenson's Anathem. I didn't know there was a trailer for the book - watch it just to whet your appetite.

Labels: ,


Saturday, August 01, 2009

Scott to direct Alien prequel 

According to io9, Ridley Scott will direct a prequel to Alien, which is probably the best scary monster movie of all time. Aliens wasn't bad either, but the first movie was in a class by itself.
Ever since Scott announced his intentions to make an Alien prequel, speculation has abounded as to whether Scott himself would return to the director's chair. Word was the commercial director (and Scott's daughter's current beau) Carl Erik Rinsch might take the reigns, but that Fox refused to greenlight the project without Scott as director. Variety now reports that Scott has agreed to direct his first Alien movie in 30 years, with Jon Spaiht attached to write the script.

Spaiht isn't a household name yet, but his philosophical science fiction romance Passengers made the 2007 Black List of best unproduced scripts. He's also scripting The Darkest Hour, a film described as "Independence Day in Moscow," for 9 producer and Wanted director Timur Bekmambetov, as well as a feature for Disney titled Children of Mars. Reportedly, Spaiht delivered a prequel pitch that wowed Scott and the studio.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, July 14, 2009

BSG's Daybreak - worst ending of all time 

Brad Templeton did not like Daybreak, the final episode of Battlestar Galactica. (For the record, neither did I). He explores the idea in a long and thoughtful essay.
Battlestar Galactica attracted a lot of fans and a lot of kudos during its run, and engendered this sub blog about it. Here, in my final post on the ending, I present the case that its final hour was the worst ending in the history of science fiction on the screen. This is a condemnation of course, but also praise, because my message is not simply that the ending was poor, but that the show rose so high that it was able to fall so very far. I mean it was the most disappointing ending ever.

(There are, of course, major spoilers in this essay.)

Other SF shows have ended very badly, to be sure. This is particularly true of TV SF. Indeed, it is in the nature of TV SF to end badly. First of all, it’s written in episodic form. Most great endings are planned from the start. TV endings rarely are. To make things worse, TV shows are usually ended when the show is in the middle of a decline. They are often the result of a cancellation, or sometimes a producer who realizes a cancellation is imminent. Quite frequently, the decline that led to cancellation can be the result of a creative failure on the show — either the original visionaries have gone, or they are burned out. In such situations, a poor ending is to be expected.

Sadly, I’m hard pressed to think of a TV SF series that had a truly great ending. That’s the sort of ending you might find in a great book or movie, the ending that caps the work perfectly, which solidifies things in a cohesive whole. Great endings will sometimes finally make sense out of everything, or reveal a surprise that, in retrospect, should have been obvious all along. I’m convinced that many of the world’s best endings came about when the writer actually worked out the ending first, then then wrote a story leading to that ending.

There have been endings that were better than the show. Star Trek: Voyager sunk to dreadful depths in the middle of its run, and its average ending was thus a step up. Among good SF/Fantasy shows, Quantum Leap, Buffy and the Prisoner stand out as having had decent endings. Babylon V’s endings (plural) were good but, just as I praise Battlestar Galactica (BSG) by saying its ending sucked, Babylon V’s endings were not up to the high quality of the show. (What is commonly believed to be B5’s original planned ending, written before the show began, might well have made the grade.)
Ron Moore’s goals

To understand the fall of BSG, one must examine it both in terms of more general goals for good SF, and the stated goals of the head writer and executive producer, Ronald D. Moore. The ending failed by both my standards (which you may or may not care about) but also his.

Moore began the journey by laying out a manifesto of how he wanted to change TV SF. He wrote an essay about Naturalistic Science Fiction where he outlined some great goals and promises, which I will summarize here, in a slightly different order

* Avoiding SF clichés like time travel, mind control, god-like powers, and technobabble.
* Keeping the science real.
* Strong, real characters, avoiding the stereotypes of older TV SF. The show should be about them, not the hardware.
* A new visual and editing style unlike what has come before, with a focus on realism.

Over time he expanded, modified and sometimes intentionally broke these rules. He allowed the ships to make sound in space after vowing they would not. He eschewed aliens in general. He increased his focus on characters, saying that his mantra in concluding the show was “it’s the characters, stupid.”

Labels: ,


Monday, July 13, 2009

SF writer trashes Moon 

A new SF movie, Moon, has gotten some good reviews, including some in SF-related blogs. But SF writer Nancy Kress was not impressed:
They lost me before the action even started, with the prologue in the form of an advertisement for a company that has discovered and now solely controls a form of cheap energy involving cold fusion. But the only thing you can use for this fusion is 'He3," a molecule found only on -- get this -- the dark side of the moon. Because of course the sub-lunar composition is different on the farside than the Earth side. Then, the evil corporation (of course) that controls this resource sets us a harvesting operation for He3, manned by ONLY one person.

Labels: ,


Saturday, July 11, 2009

Torchwood: Children of Earth was brilliant 

The third season of Torchwood, the BBC's spin-off from Doctor Who, will be broadcast on Space starting July 20. Rather than a standard 10-episode season, the BBC opted to go with a 5-part miniseries over five nights, a choice that had a lot of fans puzzled, but now that the series has appeared in Britain to both good ratings and reviews, was probably a wise decision.

Not wanting to wait, or to put up with jarring, interminable commercial breaks, I download the series from Mininova.org (thanks MM, whoever you are!). I've enjoyed Torchwood's first two seaons; it's a darker, edgier, more adult show than Doctor Who, but like its cousin, the quality has been spotty. Not this time. Children of Earth was, quite simply, brilliant. It was by far and away the best SF I've seen from the BBC, better than any prior episodes of Doctor Who or Torchwood.

Don't miss it when it shows up in a week on Space, or better yet, fire up your favourite Bittorrent client and download it. It's television SF at its finest.

Although 'Children Of Earth' experienced the occasional lull during its five days, the decision to screen the series over consecutive nights was a masterstroke. Seen in isolation, some episodes were stronger than others, but as a whole this latest incarnation of Torchwood has been a massive success. Excellent supporting turns by the likes of Capaldi, Paul Copley (Timothy/Clem), Cush Jumbo (Lois) and Liz May Brice (Johnson) squeezed every bit of depth out of their characters, while Barrowman, Eve Myles, Gareth David-Lloyd (Lanto) and Kai Owen guided us through the adventure with panache and verve.

Director Euros Lyn was consistently brilliant as he dealt with five of the most compelling hours of British science fiction since the similarly themed Quatermass. Actually, referring to the show as 'science fiction' almost does it a disservice, as if it's being dumped into some niche category. It's simply great television. Fact.


You can read the full review I quoted here, but note that it does contain spoilers (I did edit a couple out of the quote above).

Update:
Here's a good article on io9, without any serious spoilers.
Torchwood needs to come back from this shocking, disturbing, grand, insane story with something maybe a bit more pedestrian. It needs to be a regular television show again, showing us from time to time how Captain Jack helps get a cat out of a metaphorical tree. So if I were Russell T. Davies, I'd push for a regular 13-episode series next year — it can end with some kind of massive world-shattering climax, but it can also have room for episodes where there's a sex monster or Captain John has dangerous underwear or Cardiff is nearly sucked into a null dimension, or whatever. Stories that can sustain themselves for 45 minutes, but wouldn't justify five hours.

The bottom line: You can't raise the stakes again after a story like this one. If you do, you'll start dealing in stakes that are so huge, they're unimaginable. Torchwood will probably never be as good as it's been these past five days — although I'm desperately hoping to be proved wrong about that — but it can still be way better than its first two seasons, if it builds on the brilliance of "Children Of Earth." I just don't think the way to build on "Children Of Earth" is with more "Children Of Earth."

Labels: ,


Sunday, July 05, 2009

One Week 

We watched One Week this weekend, and I have to give this a five-star recommendation. It's a Canadian film about Ben, a high-school English teacher who finds out he has terminal cancer and takes off for a motorcyle ride across the country. But that brief plot summary doesn't really do the film justice - it's a funny, touching, and very human story. You'll have a lot of fun with the locations chosen for the movie - every big thing (for example, the Canada goose in Wawa, but they missed the pysanka in Vegreville) between Toronto and Tolino seems to be featured. The cast is excellent and features some well-known Canadian musicians in cameo roles.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Moon looks promising 

Wired has a review of Moon, a mew SF movie from director Duncan Jones and starring Sam Rockwell. This got quite a bit of buzz when it premiered at Sundance earlier this year, and goes into general release next week. I hope it shows up here, though I'm not holding my breath that it'll make it to the suburban cinematic wasteland where I live.
That thoughtful approach pays off, making Moon a movie that stands up to repeated viewing. Despite its relatively low budget (Jones says Moon cost $5 million to produce), this indie gem delivers plenty of gorgeous special effects (more than 450 FX shots during the 33-day production, according to the director).

Cinematographer Gary Shaw’s exterior shots rely heavily on old-school models for aesthetic as well as financial reasons, Jones said. When Sam patrols the heavily shadowed surface of the moon in a rover created by the same U.K. model makers that crafted Alien’s spaceship Nostromo, the Earth — giant, blue and beautiful — floats on the horizon almost like a colorized outtake from the Apollo 11 mission.

With no giant explosions, no monstrous aliens and no shortage of nods to cerebral sci-fi classics, Moon delivers a stirring, character-driven story about a profoundly isolated blue-collar guy in a bad situation. Rockwell’s intensely introspective performance imbues this somber little movie with sci-fi beauty that’s more than skin deep.

Labels: ,


Thursday, May 28, 2009

What Star Trek teaches us about special effects 

I enjoyed the new Star Trek movie quite a lot, and especially enjoyed the visuals, which are spectacular. But as this article points out, they're not just done for effect's sake, but to help move the movie forward. This is something that more directors could learn - like the makers of the latest Terminator movie, for example.
The trick to Star Trek, for me, was that it stayed focused, and chose carefully. Appreciating that JJ Abrams had a sizeable budget at his disposal, there was still little doubt in my mind that it was all up there on screen as I walked out at the end. The last time I think I'd seen such concentrated focus on wringing the most out of an effects budget for the benefit of the film itself was with Danny Boyle's underrated Sunshine, and I long now for other blockbuster directors to pick up some of the lessons that Star Trek has clearly demonstrated.

Because special effects exist to enhance a story, not be the story. They're there to add a dose of magic to what happens on screen, rather than become the primary focus of it. In Star Trek, the battle around Vulcan is the standout example for me, but even something like the drilling sequences worked a treat, and whenever JJ cut to a wide shot of the Enterprise travelling through space, I bought it every time. It actually mattered.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, May 26, 2009

First reviews for Ledger's The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus 

Terry Gilliam's latest movie, The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus, is also the last to star the late Heath Ledger. so it's premiere at Cannes has been getting more than the usual attention. Here'an article summarizing some of the early reviews, which have been ... mixed - typical for most of Gilliam's movies.

Labels: ,


Sunday, May 24, 2009

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button 

I finally got around to seeing The Curious Case of Benjamin Button last night, and I was completely blown away. It's a beautiful, poignant masterpiece, and will go into the canon as one of the classic fantasy films - although I think most mainstream viewers won't recognize it as such. I can't recommend this film highly enough. I'm boggled that it wasn't nominated for a Hugo award, although most voters probably thought it was a 2009 movie.

Labels: ,


Friday, May 15, 2009

Trailer: Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus 

I have to admit that I've developed Nancy's fondness for (generally bad) monster movies, and this one looks like it's going to be a big hit with us. Move over Godzilla: here comes Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus

Labels: ,


Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Star Trek meets Star Wars 

Have you ever wondered what would happen if the Enterprise ended up in the Star Wars universe? Wonder no more. Hint: it's not pretty, but it is well done.

Labels: , ,


Saturday, May 09, 2009

Fast Forward a go 

Fast Forward, the TV series based on Robert Sawyer's SF novel of the same name, is going ahead, with 13 episodes on order.
When it premieres, Flash Forward will feature a lot of familiar faces, both in front of and behind the cameras; Joseph Fiennes, Pirates of the Carribean's Jack Davenport and Star Trek's John Cho lead the cast, while the showrunners are Green Lantern and Amazing Spider-Man's Marc Guggenheim and The Dark Knight and Blade's David Goyer (who co-wrote the pilot with former Star Trek franchise chief Brannon Braga). Even before the official order, the show was widely assumed to be a definite go considering that ABC has already been running teaser trailers for it during the last two episodes of Lost; those teasers are now being pointed to by some as a sign that the show will either be paired with the island drama or, more likely, be in its Wednesday timeslot before Lost's January 2010 return.

Congrats to Rob, who joins the very slim club of SF writers who've had a TV series produced from one of their books.

Labels: ,


Thursday, April 23, 2009

J.G. Ballard eulogized by John Clute 

SF author J.G. Ballard died earlier this week. He was probably best known for his autobiographical "The Empire of the Sun", made into a pretty decent film by Steven Spielberg, and the dystopian "Crash", filmed by David Cronenberg. But during his career, he wrote many edgy, intense SF stories and novels that helped move science fiction out of the pulp era. Critic John Clute has published a heartfelt and thoughtful eulogy to him in The Independent.
For 30 years J.G. Ballard had many readers in many lands. For them, everything he published was news. But after Steven Spielberg based a good though not incandescent film on his autobiographical novel, Empire of the Sun (1984), Ballard became publicly newsworthy over large parts of the world that his words had never reached directly.

He became a sage and prophet, whose visions of the cost of living in the modern world were an integral part of our understanding of the shape of things to come. At least one English dictionary has accepted "Ballardian" as a term descriptive of the landscape of the late 20th century: bleak, rusted out, choked with Ozymandian relics of the space age now past, dystopian – a landscape which surreally embodies the psychopathologies of modern humanity.

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Interview with Mythbusters' Adam Savage 

Here's an interview with Adam Savage, the co-host of one of my favourite TV shows, Mythbusters' . Like almost everyone else I've talked to about the show, I'd love to have his job (alhtough I will admit that I probably couldn't do it - while I have a good background in science, I don't have the necessary mechanical knowledge).
Lifehacker: How do you plan out a season of MythBusters? How much can you plan ahead, and how much space do you leave yourself to explore stuff you hadn't anticipated?

Adam Savage: The flow of the season happens very much like the flow of an episode. We'll plot out a straight line through an episode, or a season, then it changes radically, constantly. The story list for the next full season, for example, had 60 stories. That came from a master list of about 130, 140 items, from which we'll choose 60. As we film that season, we'll end up following maybe 40 of those, but then 20 new items come up during shooting. All it takes is one more news story for me to realize how I could dig into something.

... There's also room for totally randoms stuff. Jamie came up with this idea of proving you could build a working ship out of wood pulp and water, during the Alaska episode. What we built was stupendous, and what we built wasn't on anybody's list. It normally takes about 9 or 10 days to finish a story, but we try to be flexible. We find a story sometimes we just don't want to sink our teeth into or, more often, need to give more juice to. We had one thing, duct tape, slotted as a three-day story, but we realized that is not a small story. We can turn on the idea that duct tape can do almost anything. So we turned out this episode that takes duct tape to the absolute edge of its performance capabilities.

Labels: , ,


Friday, March 06, 2009

Video killed the video store 

Rogers recently closed two of their video stores near us leaving us with the choice of either Blockbuster or the limited (but cheaper) selection at the market across the street. Or the ridiculously overpriced on-demand movies on Rogers' own cable system. Of course, since I have a DivX compatible DVD player, Internet downloads are an option here too, at least for TV shows like Doctor Who. And with a proxy server, it's possible to watch US TV services like Hulu.

So it's no wonder that Blockbuster is close to filing for bankruptcy. Wired looks at the future of the video store, and it's not pretty.
Driving or walking to the video store to bring home less than a gig of data — data that may or may not even be in stock — just doesn't make much sense anymore.

At least not when compared to Netflix's easy ordering system, its recommendation engine, lack of late fees, deeper inventory and clever use of the Postal Service to have movies delivered quickly.

Blockbuster tried to keep up, with an innovative mail rental plan that let people trade in movies at the store as well, but the plan turned out to be too complicated and too late.

But even the notion of even leaving the room to get a movie, doesn't make sense if you have a fat internet connection and the willingness to explore some legal and less-legal ways to download movies to a computer.

Labels: ,


Friday, February 20, 2009

Will Wheaton liked Watchmen - a lot 

Here's an article by Will Wheaton, who was lucky enough to see an advance screening of Watchmen. He liked it -- a lot. Just in case you're worried about spoilers, there aren't any.
The lights went down, the film began, and after just a few minutes, my apprehension was gone. I knew after the Comedian hit the street that this was going to be everything I'd hoped for. For the next two hours and forty-five minutes, I gasped, I cheered, I applauded, I was stunned and I was blown away. Most importantly, though, I was transported to the world I first visited, one issue at a time, when I was a teenager. When it was over, I wanted to go right back to the beginning and start over again, just like I did when I finished the graphic novel back in the 80s.



I'm not going to discuss specifics, because that would suck for a lot of people, but: PAY ATTENTION, MY FELLOW GEEKS: YOU HAVE NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT.

(Did I just all-cap and bold that? I guess I did. What is this, MacWrite in 1986? Whatever. I'm leaving it, because it's that important to me that my fellow geeks read it.)

Labels: ,


Monday, February 09, 2009

Coraline is a masterpiece 

I went to see Coraline last night, and was completely blown away by the movie. It's a magical, beatiful, dreamlike, and occasionally terrifying (especially if you have a think about spiders) masterpiece. Don't be put off by the fact that it's ostensibly a fantasy for children - like the best children's literature and film, it has a richness that makes gives it a nearly universal appeal.

Based on the reaction of the children in the theatre, it might not be suitable for younger kids ("Is it over yet" was one plaintive comment from down the aisle). If they can handle Myazaki, (who this movie reminds me of quite a lot), they should be OK with Coraline.

Neil Gaiman, on whose novella the movie is based, was in Toronto this week doing promotion for the film. He's very popular here, as this article from the Toronto Star explains.

And that was just the beginning. Ask Gaiman for his archetypal Toronto fan moment and he recalls it instantly.

"I came out for a signing in 1991 for Season of Mists. There was a line stretching around the block outside the Silver Snail at 3 p.m. when I was supposed to start. I signed for hours and hours.

"Round about 1 a.m., I got back to my hotel room and discovered that room service had long since packed it in. So I sat in the bath, eating my complimentary bedside cookie, resting my sore, swollen arm and thinking sarcastically, `So this is the glamorous life!' but also seriously being aware that this was something very special."


Update: Here's a review by Locus' Gary Westfahl, who's obviously read and liked the book (I have not), and likes the movie, but rather less than the book.
For lovers of Neil Gaiman's novel Coraline (2002), writer/director Henry Selick's stop-motion animated film is about as good an adaptation as they could have realistically hoped for: he is generally faithful to the book's storyline — a young girl named Coraline Jones (Dakota Fanning), neglected by her busy parents, enters an alternate world with a doting "other mother" (Teri Hatcher) who turns out to be a predatory monster — and he also endeavors to emulate its special tone. If he doesn't quite succeed in doing so, that is because Gaiman's work is very much a gentle, charming fantasy, and whenever Hollywood applies its formulas for sure-fire box-office success, it rarely does "gentle" or "charming" very well. As a whole, then, the film struck me as a bit too blunt, too crass, too bombastic for my taste. (I mean, a topless Miss Forcible [Dawn French] wearing pasties?) It shouts while Gaiman whispers, dazzles while Gaiman tickles.

Labels: ,


The Prisoner is on the web 

The classic British TV series, The Prisoner, starring the late Patrick McGoohan, is available for viewing on the web at AMC TV. Wikipedia says: "Although sold as a spy thriller in the mould of McGoohan's previous series, Danger Man (called "Secret Agent" in its U.S. release), the show's combination of 1960s countercultural themes and its surreal setting had a far-reaching effect on science fiction/fantasy programming, and on popular culture in general."

Of course, being on a US site, the show is geoblocked so that only US viewers can watch it. Of course, there are ways around that.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Wired reviews Coraline 

Wired has a glowing review of the film adaptation of Neil Gaiman's Coraline. I've seen several trailers for this and it looks brilliant.
It takes nerve to craft a horror story about children in this day and age, where glossy wastes like Kung Fu Panda and Hannah Montana have usurped our children's intelligence and healthy sense of fear. We have come a long way from the uncensored violence of Carlo Collodi's original 1883 Adventures of Pinocchio and perhaps even Jeunet and Caro's surrealist 1995 classic, The City of Lost Children. Which is to say, we have lost our way.

But this latest installment of the little-girl-lost narrative may restore the public's faith in fairy tales that don't have rousing musical numbers (although They Might Be Giants makes a boisterous appearance in the "Other Father Song") or plots stripped of danger but brimming with production value. Selick and Gaiman's cinematic adaptation is a mind-blowing good time masquerading as a coming-of-age tale wrapped in a warning. Don't miss it.

Labels: ,


Sunday, February 01, 2009

Looking forward to the next Terminator movie 

I rather like the Terminator movies, at least the first two anyway. And Steve Stirling's three Terminator novels are quite good - certainly a step up from your average movie novelization and provide a lot of the back story in a very entertaining package. I haven't gotten into the Sarah Connor Chronicles though.

The next movie in the series, Terminator Salvation, looks like it might be good. Wired has an article which includes an interview with the director and some really intriguing artwork. It looks like they're going for a re-imagining of the series, something like what was done with Batman recently.
With one eye on the screen and the other on reactions from fans and journalists gathered at the Directors Guild of American screening room, the former music video director showed off the post-Judgment Day world he's crafting for Terminator Salvation. The scenes showed new Terminator models and bleak vistas from a nuke-ravaged Earth destroyed by sentient computer network Skynet.

Work-in–progress action sequences looked impressive enough to suggest that McG and his collaborators might just restore the franchise to its former glory.

Labels: ,


Thursday, January 29, 2009

SF novels that would make good movies 

In his AMC column, John Scalzi picks some SF novels that would make good movies. Not every SF novel is a candidate for a film adaptation - many SF novels are just too complex to fit into a two or three hour film. (Look what happened to Dune). All of the novels he suggests are good picks; to those, I'd like to add Robert Heinlein's Tunnel in the Sky and Have Spacesuit, Will Travel, and Robert Charles Wilson's Axis.
Snow Crash (Neal Stephenson): Frankly, any of Stephenson's novels would make a terrific flick (with the exception of his aptly-named Baroque Cycle trilogy, which need to be multi-year television series). But if I had to pick one, I'd go with Snow Crash, because from the ridiculously funny pizza delivery at the start, the book never stops coming at you. And, let's face it, everyone loves the idea of a katana-wielding super geek squaring off against the dogmatic forces of evil. This story would need a director with an offbeat, jazzy sense of pacing -- I nominate Guy Ritchie or Danny Boyle.

Could it happen? There's nothing in the works, but this is one of those books I expect will hit screens eventually.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, January 20, 2009

How they do that yellow line 

I'm not a big football fan, at least of American football - I do enjoy the CFL. One thing I've always wondered about is how they superimpose the yellow line that shows the location of the first down. This article explains how - and there's a lot of processing involved. There's also a video that shows the process in action.

Labels: ,


Monday, January 19, 2009

Good news for Stargate fans 

There's good news for Stargate fans. The new series, Stargate Universe, will have SF writer John Scalzi as a creative consultant. I quite enjoyed the original Stargate series, at least the first few seasons; although I never got into the next series, Stargate Atlantis (my son is a big fan, though). Having an SF writer of Scalzi's calibre on the show is a very good thing - and he's also quite well versed in film.
To answer questions that immediately come to mind: What “creative consultant” means in this case is to assist the producers and directors in shaping the direction of the series, to offer technical writing suggestions and advice, and basically to be useful when they want another point of view on something; it’s a background rather than foreground sort of job. No, I won’t be writing for the series at this point; hey, I just got the one gig, let me do that first. Yes, I’ve seen scripts and now know all sorts of stuff about the series you don’t, yet. No, I won’t tell you anything more than what’s already out there; my title is “creative consultant,” not “dude who leaks stuff.” Yes, the producers and writers are very smart folks who have a definite idea of what they want SGU to be, and I think it’s a good and intriguing idea with lots of interesting possibilities, which is why I signed on. No, I won’t be moving to Vancouver, though it’s a lovely town. Yes, dinner last night was spectacular, and I’m currently filled with crispy duck and other delights. I know for a fact Joe Mallozzi will be blogging about it, with lots of pictures of our dishes. Foodies, prepare to go insane.

There's a follow-up post from Scalzi, with more details, here.

Labels: ,


Thursday, January 15, 2009

A movie I'm looking forward to 

Alien Trespass looks to be a dead-on send up of the 1950s SF and flying saucer B movies. I definitely want to see it.
The film is set in 1957 and shows what happens to the residents of a small California town, when an alien space ship crashes. First comes the monster, then the alien bounty hunter (Urp) and then the cops. It looks like one of those sweet, "If we all put our minds together we can beat this thing" films. Alien Trespass premiered at the 2009 Palm Springs International Film Festival, but we'll have to see where it pops up at next on the festival circuit.

Labels: ,


Thursday, December 18, 2008

Best SF films of 2008 

John Scalzi weighs in with his picks for the best SF films of 2008. A couple of movies are notable by their absence: The Golden Compass and The Day the Earth Stood Still. His pick for the best movie is Wall-E and I'm not going to argue too much with him on that one - it was a great film that worked on many levels.

Labels: ,


Friday, December 05, 2008

Caprica gets go ahead 

The Battlestar Galactica prequel Caprica has finally gotten the go ahead from the Sci Fi Channel. They've committed to 20 episodes, to start in 2010. From the press release:
Set 50 years before "Battlestar Galactica," "Caprica" follows two rival families -- the Graystones and the Adamas -- as they grow, compete, and thrive in the vibrant world of the 12 Colonies, a society recognizably close to our own. Enmeshed in the burgeoning technology of artificial intelligence and robotics that will eventually lead to the creation of the Cylons, the two houses go toe-to-toe blending action with corporate conspiracy and sexual politics. "Caprica" will deliver all of the passion, intrigue, political backbiting and family conflict in television’s first science fiction family saga. As the series begins, a startling development is about to occur -- the creation of the first cybernetic life-form node or "Cylon" -- the ability to marry artificial intelligence with mechanical bodies. Joseph Adama (Morales) -- father of future "Battlestar" commander William Adama (Najafi) -- a renowned civil liberties lawyer, becomes an opponent of the experiments undertaken by the Graystones (Stoltz), owners of a large computer corporation that is spearheading the development of these living robots: the Cylons.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Monty Python's YouTube channel 

The excellent folks from Monty Python have set up their own YouTube channel and are putting their much loved (and much bootlegged) clips and films up on it for our enjoyment. The hope is that people will return the favour by buying some of their DVDs, at least the few that they don't have already. It's a wonderful way to treat their fans, and the announcement video is pure Python.

Labels: ,


Saturday, November 08, 2008

Straczynski talks Forbidden Planet 

It seems that the rumoured remake of Forbidden Planet may go ahead with J. Michael (Babylon 5) Straczynski as the writer. This is definitely something I'd like to see.
Apparently, Straczynski's script will be more of a continuation, or a companion piece, than an actual remake. It's possible the new movie retcons the story a bit, and leaves Altair 4 intact and alive. The beloved Robby the Robot will be in it, and the movie will be "an enormous, giant, retro sci-fi movie ... nothing sleek or 'chromy'" in its visuals.

If you were a Babylon 5 fan, you know Straczynski's love for the original film runs as deep as anyone else's. It sounds like he's trying to do right by the story, and yet give fans a little something new. If it's a movie that continues the nightmares of the original, I think that could be pretty darn cool, and a nice break from the reboots and outright remakes that are taking over Hollywood. But, let's turn it over to you Planet fans in the comments, and see if this softens the blow, or just rubs salt in the wound.

Labels: ,


Friday, October 17, 2008

Ridley Scott to adapt The Forever War 

Ridley Scott (Blade Runner, Alien, and the currently showing Body of Lies) is set to adapt Joe Haldeman's classic SF novel, The Forever War, according to BoingBoing. If this pans out, it could be good - certainly the source material is.

Labels: ,


Saturday, October 04, 2008

Sanctuary 

Sanctuary premiered on the Movie Network (and Sci-Fi Channel in the US) last night. It's an interesting show, produced largely on green-screen sets, as this Wired article explains, and with a premise that lets it mix in elements as diverse as Jack the Ripper, Druids, and Bigfoot. The first episode was promising - production values are high, and I like Amanda Tapping (Stargate SG-1's Samantha Carter). The pilot was certainly better than the similarly-themed Fringe, which I gave up on halfway through the first episode.

The show was originally produced as a web series, with eight episodes produced before the Sci-Fi Channel snapped it up. They're still floating around on torrent sites, if you want to grab them.

Labels: ,


Saturday, September 20, 2008

Unravelled Fringe 

Fringe, by Lost creator, J.J. Abrams, is supposedly one of the best new TV shows of the fall season. It's certainly one of the most hyped. But after seeing the pilot and second episode (or at least as much of each episode as I could stand watching), I'm distinctly underwhelmed. Melissa Singer, on Tor.com, shares my opinion.
But now I’ve seen two episodes, and in my opinion, if this is the best new show of the Fall, the rest of the season is going to be pretty lousy.

I've pretty much given up on network TV shows. I do rather like the original CSI and CSI Miami, and of course there's the BBC imports, Doctor Who and Torchwood, but that's about it. The only TV shows that are really worth watching are on the cable networks, and even then, those are few and far between. Unless a show is as good as Six Feet Under, The Sopranos, or BattleStar Galactica, I'll pass.

Labels: ,


Friday, August 22, 2008

2001 toilet instructions 

In the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, there's a scene showing the instructions for a zero-gee toilet. The instructions are complex and the shot in the movie is just a glimpse, so you can't really read them. If, like me, you've been wondering for years what they said, wonder no longer - here they are. There are 10 steps.
ZERO GRAVITY TOILET

PASSENGERS ARE ADVISED TO
READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE USE

1 The Toilet is of the standard zero-gravity type. Depending on requirements, system A and/or system B can be used, details of which are clearly marked in the toilet compartment. When operating system A, depress lever and a plastic dalkron eliminator will be dispensed through the slot immediately underneath. When you have fastened the adhesive lip, attach connection marked by the large "X" outlet hose. Twist the silver coloured ring one inch below the connection point until you feel it lock.

2 The toilet is now ready for use. The Sonovac cleanser is activated by the small switch on the lip. When securing, twist the ring back to its initial-condition, so that the two orange lines meet. Disconnect. Place the dalkron eliminator in the vacuum receptacle to the rear. Activate by pressing the blue button.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, August 05, 2008

The Dark Knight 

We saw The Dark Knight recently and thoroughly enjoyed it. It wasn't a pefect movie but was certainly about as good as a superhero movie is likely to get. There's been a lot of press about the movie (most of it ranging from favourable to fawning), but this review on Asking the Wrong Questions is about the most thoughtful that I've seen.
When Batman Begins was released and the entire internet was falling over itself, going on about the best superhero film ever and My God, the Realism, I found myself left out of the celebrations. I liked the film well enough, but I thought it was held back from greatness, or for that matter even very goodness, by the same flaws which, earlier this year, marred my enjoyment of Iron Man. The dialogue was atrocious, the villains forgettable, and the plot trapped in the well-worn grooves of the superhero origin story, and thus completely predictable. It was only at its very end that Batman Begins--again setting an example that Iron Man would later follow--made me sit up and take notice, in a scene in which Gordon uses the Bat Signal for the first time and makes a tentative alliance with Batman. Even as he chooses to tolerate Batman's presence in the city, Gordon notes that that presence is an escalation in the terms of the battle between law and lawlessness, and that its consequences will be that the other side will match it--producing the Joker's calling card as an example.

This scene was a rare example of a superhero film actually delivering what most of them claim to be trying to envision--realism, an actual exploration of what it means to be a superhero in the real world, and of what it is like to live in a world that is much like ours but also has superheroes in it. Most superhero films take these two elements--the superhero and his accouterments, the real world and its troubles--and treat them as two discrete layers. So that we get a Tony Stark who is shocked, shocked to discover that the vicious weapons he makes have ended up in the hands of America's enemies and yet also lives in the same world as the rest of us, in which America has for years been arming groups in one decade only to fight them in the next. When the tropes of any particular superhero show up in these films, they often feel like fanservice, or like the filmmakers unthinkingly ticking items off a list--Superman has to moonlight as a bumbling, four-eyed journalist; J. Jonah Jameson has to have ridiculous hair and a hate-on for Spiderman. What struck me about that final scene in Batman Begins is that it imagined the Joker growing organically out of the universe it had created, striving not for realism but for internal consistency, commingling Batman's familiar elements and the ones familiar from our lives into something new and all its own.

Labels:


Thursday, July 24, 2008

Interview with Wall-E animator 

Den of the Geek has a lengthy interview with Angus MacLane, the supervising animator of Pixar's excellent and latest film, Wall-E. For a site called Den of the Geek, it's surprisingly non-technical, but interesting nonetheless.
The technological advances you must face with every Pixar project seem to us quite dramatic. How does that manifest itself with every new film? How early do you have to ‘lock’ the look of a project?

The look of the film is locked when the film comes out, I think! You can still affect things in many ways. But initially there’s the pre-production process, and we sort out what the look of the film is going to be. Early on they’ll do painting, and the production designer Ralph Eggleston was very specific about this is the look I want, and worked with Andrew [Stanton, director] very closely to establish the look of the film.

I don’t think it changed that much as we went through the film. So that was established pretty early on. I would say two years into it, the story’s being sorted out, the look of the film has then gone through an iteration of being on the screen in actual finished film, and I think that’s when it’s sorted out.

Labels:


Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Wall-E 

We went to see Wall-E the other night and enjoyed it a lot. It features Pixar's usual amazing animation and was funny enough on several levels for both adults and children to enjoy it. Here's one of the better reviews I've seen of it from Asking the Wrong Questions.

Labels: ,


Saturday, June 28, 2008

The Dark Knight director shuns digital 

The Dark Knight, the next movie in the Batman saga, will be out next month and Wired has an article describing how director Christopher Nolan shot much of the movie in the Imax format and without digital effects. From what I've seen from the preview, this one could be even better than Batman Begins. I might try to get to the Imax version of this one -- from what the articles says, it should be worth it.
The Bat-plan was simple: Base-jump off one Hong Kong skyscraper, smash through the window of another, grab the Chinese crime boss, then hitch a drag chute to a passing C-130 cargo plane for a daring aerial escape. And on to Gotham! An instant, no-fuss extradition in the best tradition of American vigilantism. Just another working day for Batman and, presumably, just another feat of digital wizardry for the visual effects team. Except for one thing: Christopher Nolan, director of The Dark Knight, wanted to do it for real.

Which is a funny thing to want when you're making a lavish superhero sequel here in the heyday of the greenscreen. And certainly not an easy thing to get, 88 stories above a juddering megacity on the other side of the world. "They spent weeks in preproduction working out a way to hang the stuntman from one helicopter and have a second helicopter following him with the camera," says Wally Pfister, the movie's director of photography. Two choppers and a stuntman on a string — all to make a comic- book hero seem as credible on film as Frank Serpico or The French Connection's Popeye Doyle. All to make a comic-book movie speak the cinematic language of crime thrillers.

Labels:


Friday, June 27, 2008

Wall-E - an SF movie in disguise? 

According to this review from Gizmodo, Pixar's latest cartoon, Wall-E, is one of the best SF movies in years, disguised as a cartoon. The previews I saw looked promising, so I guess maybe I'll go see it.
Wall-E features loving nods to everything from Brave New World to 2001 to Star Wars without ever feeling derivative. Instead, it builds on them, making what has the potential to be an almost relentlessly bleak world into one full of complete joy and levity. It always has that undercurrent of melancholy just under the surface, as we never really forget that humanity has utterly destroyed the planet and turned itself into a race of pudgy, helpless babies, but heart of the story is Wall-E and his longing for love.

And isn't that the sign of great science fiction? While on the surface it's a movie about robots and spaceships set centuries in the future, deep down it's about humanity and its place on Earth and in the universe. It uses its out-of-this-world settings and characters as a lens to reflect our own world back at us, showing us both the beauty and the ugliness of our existence through the eyes of a guileless, trash-compacting robot.

In a movie season that's overpopulated with tired superhero movies, remakes and sequels, it's incredibly refreshing to see a movie that stands on its own as a completely new and unique creation. It's safe to say you've never seen anything like Wall-E, and you might not see anything like it again. Go. Go see it as soon as you can.

Labels: ,


Monday, June 16, 2008

Some thoughts on Battlestar Galactica 

I watched the mid-season finale of Battlestar Galactica this weekend. Finally, they reach Earth. But the show's not over yet, and there'll be another 10 episodes in 2009.

I'm looking forward to seeing where they go from here. The first half of the fourth season (4.1?) was a big improvement over season 3. I just wish we didn't have to wait until next year to find out how things end.

Abigail Nussbaum has a long and thoughtful post about the fourth season of Battlestar Galactica that's well worth the time to read.
This isn't a case of the show building on what came before it, gradually constructing plot arcs, character arcs, and themes. Instead, Galactica's season 4 is giving off the whiff of Friends's season 10, when the writers realized that there was finally nothing stopping them from putting Ross and Rachel together permanently. It's hard to escape the conclusion that a similar reticence tied the hands of Galactica's writers in season 3 and the latter half of season 2--a crippling fear of changing the show's format, of doing anything too drastic or too new, of veering too far from the status quo. Knowing that the end is nigh has obviously freed the show's writers from this fear, but now they have to contend with the mess they've made. For all my reservations there's no denying that Galactica has measurably improved in its fourth season, and the shocking-yet-not-surprising ending of "Revelations" sets the stage for a potentially very interesting conclusion. It may well be that Galactica's strong beginning will be matched by a strong ending, but I will always think sadly of the show we might have had if its writers had been willing to give us a worthwhile middle.

Labels: ,


Thursday, June 05, 2008

Torchwood gets season 3 

Good news for fans of British SF television - Torchwood will get a third season. If you haven't seen Torchwood, do yourself a favour and find them on a Torrent site. It's a Doctor Who spin-off, but much grittier - think of an adult Men in Black.
For those who are not familiar, Torchwood is a British science fiction drama that centers on a team that is tasked with keeping an eye on the space/time Rift that runs through the city, and on whatever washes through it. It also deals with the activities of the Cardiff branch of the fictional Torchwood Institute, which deals mainly with incidents involving extraterrestrials. Created by Russell T Davies, the show also features Burn Gorman as Dr. Owen Harper, Naoko Mori as Toshiko Sato, and Gareth David-Lloyd as Ianto Jones.

Labels: ,


Sunday, June 01, 2008

The Secret History of Star Wars 

The Secret History of Star Wars is "a new full-length e-book exploring the writing and creation of the Star Wars saga. Culled from over 400 sourcesjavascript:void(0)
Publish Post and filled with quotes from people such as George Lucas, Gary Kurtz and Mark Hamill, The Secret History of Star Wars traces all the way back to 1973 to examine how the first 14-page treatment that began the series came to be and was slowly built, draft by draft, year by year and movie by movie."

It's available online as a free 528 page PDF.

I'm not that big of a Star Wars fan, but it was a tremendously influential movie, and the story of its development is an important part of cinematic history.

Labels: ,


Monday, May 26, 2008

Prince Caspian 

We went to see Prince Caspian last night, the second in the Chronicle of Narnia series. I didn't like the first movie all that much, but this one is much better. It's not quite up to the level of the The Lord of the Rings, but there are some very good moments in it. The scene where a cloud of flowers morphs into a flying woman's face sent chills down my spine. Overall, the movie has a darker and more adult feel than the first one. Don't wait for the DVD - this is definitely a big-screen event.

Labels: ,


Saturday, May 24, 2008

The Digital Magic Behind Indiana Jones 

Here's an article that describes some of the digital effects used in the latest Indiana Jones movie. From the reviews I've seen so far, the over-reliance on digital effects is one of the movie's weaknesses.

Labels:


Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Spin headed for the big screen 

Robert Charles Wilson's Hugo-award-winning novel, Spin, is headed for the big screen. There aren't a lot of details at this point, but it will be produced by Olympus Pictures and Rob Morrow's Bits & Pieces Picture Co.

Spin is a wonderful novel, but it's rather more cerebral than the usual Hollywood sci-fi blockbuster. I have my doubts that it'll survive the big-screen treatment with much of its original quality intact, but hopefully Wilson will get a good chunk of cash out of the deal.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, May 20, 2008

How Star Wars changed the match 

John Scalzi looks at Hollywood blockbusters (tis the season, after all), and why a movie that opens with a $20,000,000 weekend can be considered a disaster, and comes to the conclusion that it's all because of Star Wars.
There he goes, there goes Speed Racer -- right into a wall: Last weekend Speed Racer crashed and burned at the box office, pulling in a feeble $20 million. This gives 2008 its first major SF/F flop and assures that Warner Bros and its financing partners are going to eat most of the rumored $150 million production cost of the film (not to mention the additional tens of millions for marketing). Right now, the Wachowskis are sitting in a dark room, looking at the numbers and realizing that they really do have to stop cruising on the cred they earned on the original Matrix flick -- that's all gone now.

If Only the Wachowskis Had Released Speed Racer 31 Years Earlier
Because here's something interesting: On July 15, 1977, after several weeks in limited release, Star Wars had its official wide release and pulled in $6.8 million for the weekend, which, adjusted for inflation, would be about $20.9 million dollars today. Star Wars would go on to make more than $300 million in its initial release (a gobsmacking $930 million or so in 2008 dollars), and, of course, go down in movie history, spawning a franchise that is even now dropping films into theaters. (The animated Clone Wars, heading to screens in August.)

So, the question, which the Wachowskis might ruefully ask, is: Why does a $20 million opening spell disaster for Speed Racer today when its equivalent was absolutely fantastic for Star Wars, back in the day? Movies are still the same strips of images on film stock in 2008 as they were in 1977 -- has everything else about movies changed so much?

Labels: ,


Wednesday, May 14, 2008

I always thought it looked like a harmonica 

Here's an hilarious Star Wars mashup - Darth Vader as a blues harmonica player.

Labels: , ,


Monday, May 12, 2008

Project Moonbase and Others 

Robert Heinlein wrote the script for the Hollywood movie, Destination Moon. But it's not well known that he also wrote scripts for an unproduced TV series, now collected in the book, Project Moonbase and Others. This is a limited edition, aimed at libraries and collectors. Subterranean Press has put the introduction by John Scalzi up on their site, as well as the script of "Delilah and the Space Rigger", based on one of Heinlein's short stories.
In the early 1950s, and one assumes after the success of Destination Moon, Robert Heinlein teamed up with producer Jack Seaman to create a science fiction television anthology series. The anthology series had as a framing device a teacher educating a student of his about the history of space exploration; the episodes themselves were largely adaptations of Heinlein’s “Future History” stories, with some original teleplays written or proposed to go along with them. One of those original teleplays, “Ring Around the Moon,” was put into production as the pilot for the series.

And what happened to the series? Well, nothing happened to the series; what happened is that Jack Seaman unilaterally decided to make “Ring Around the Moon” into a feature film, retitled Project Moonbase, padding out the script and story to feature length (barely: the whole thing clocks in at sixty-three minutes) and getting it out to theaters in September of 1953. The movie was made “economically”–which is to say so cheaply that its sets and costumes were used simultaneously on another production, the evocatively-titled Cat-Women of the Moon (“love-starved moon maidens on the prowl!” exclaimed one tagline for the flick)–and its biggest star was the guy who would later be best known as “Dr. Bellows” on I Dream of Jeanie. To call the acting of the leads Donna Martel and Ross Ford wooden is to invite splinters from affronted furniture and railings.

Labels: ,


Monday, April 28, 2008

Summer sci-i movie smackdown 

The SF Site's Summer Sci-Fi Movie Smackdown is worth looking at if you're an SF movie fan. It has short comments on the SF movies coming up this summer with links to clips and trailers. It looks like May will be a good month, with Iron Man, Prince Caspian, and the 4th Indiana Jones movie.

Labels: ,


Sunday, April 13, 2008

What happened last night 

Just in case you were trying to figure out just exactly what happened in last night's episode of Battlestar Galactica, IO9 has a good summary and explanation of some of the finer points, of which there were many. It was definitely one of the best episodes in a very long time.

Labels: ,


Saturday, April 12, 2008

The Mist 

Stephen King's The Mist is one of the few stories that really scared me. The movie adaptation isn't quite as scary as the novella, but it's a still a nearly perfectly realized version of King's story. It's most definitely not for the fainthearted. The Cinematical review pretty much says it all:
After mining the soft-and-fuzzy (and yet still kinda grisly) end of Stephen King's literary catalog with The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile, writer-director Frank Darabont may seem like an unlikely choice for tackling one of King's shorter, grimmer horror tales. After turning high-end King into Oscar statues and nominations, why go slumming in the shabbier-seeming sections of King's catalog? Darabont's proven he can warm our hearts with King's stories, but does he have what it takes to chill our blood with one of the author's less high-minded efforts?

The Mist answers that question with a firm "Yes," although you'll be hard-pressed to hear it over the shrieks and shouts coming from the screen and the audience. Darabont's made what can best be called a grade-A B-movie, full of jolts and jumps and classic monster-movie tricks played out with old-school showmanship and thoroughly modern special effects. The plot is vintage King, placing ordinary people in an extraordinary circumstance and watching to see who dies and who doesn't, who discovers hidden strength and who displays hidden madness. And no, The Mist is nothing new -- but it's superbly executed, and far smarter than it had to be. Apparently, Darabont read The Mist when it was published in 1980 and longed to make a film from it; instead, his debut was Shawshank, with The Mist in development limbo for years. The horror fan in me thinks it was more than worth the wait.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, April 09, 2008

A Day in the Afterlife 

Philip K. Dick is now one of the best known 20th century science fiction writers, largely due to several big budget movies being made from his stories (Minority Report, Total Recall, and Bladerunner for a start). He's also getting a lot of attention from academics and the literati. If you want to find out more about his life, you can watch an hour long documentary called Philip K. Dick: A Day in the Afterlife, linked on the SF Signal site.

Labels: ,


Monday, April 07, 2008

Real Military Flix 

Real Military Flix is a huge collection of old military films from WWI up through the present. Currently there are about 600 films online, with more to be added. It's very well organized. You can browse by category or search the site and each film has it's own page with a detailed description. Contents range from actual war footage, some of it quite graphic, newsreels, and miltary training and propoganda films.

Labels: ,


Saturday, April 05, 2008

The Mike Wallace interviews 

Before he became famous on 60 Minutes, Mike Wallace was known for his television interview shows. Unlike most TV interviews now, these interviews had real substance. Many of them are collected in this archive at the University of Texas. The guest is incredible: Aldous Huxley, Frank Lloyd Wright, Gloria Swanson, Steve Allen, Kirk Douglas, Eleanor Roosevelt, Salvador Dali, and many more.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Some Battlestar Galactica tidbits 

Just a couple of weeks until the start of the fourth (and final) season of Battlestar Galactica, so here's some tidbits as reported on Underwire.
# Caprica, a two-hour pilot that takes place 50 years before BSG, has been given the green light. As the Galactica stars were gearing up to come on stage, Eick was setting up meetings to start casting and continue planning. The show will begin production this spring and will air in the fall.
# Producer Moore is directing his first episode (episode 12 to be exact), and Edward James Olmos, who directed two episodes in the past , will direct this season as well.
# A new series of webisodes has been ordered for season four.

Much more in the article.

Labels: ,


Friday, March 14, 2008

Interview with Harlan Ellison 

If there was any justice in the world, Harlan Ellison would be as famous and commerically successful as Stephen King, and he'd have a Nobel Prize for literature too. Then again, maybe that would have spoiled him, though having seen him in action, I doubt it. Film maker Erik Nelson has made a movie about Ellison's life, titled Dreams with Sharp Teeth, which I'm very much looking forward to seeing.

Salon Magazine has published a short interview with Ellison. They were nice enough to link to the full interview as an MP3, so you can catch Harlan in all his glory. Having heard him speak several times, I can assure you that the printed word does not do him justice.
As a concept, the human race seems to be a very workable idea. When you get down to the individuals, most of them need a ball-peen hammer to the middle of their forehead to make them move even as a slow pony. I figure any species that is capable of writing "Moby-Dick" and painting the Sistine Chapel ceiling and putting people on the moon does not have to settle for novels by Judith Krantz, McDonald's toad burgers and movies like "Dumb and Dumberer." What is that Latin phrase? Spero melior -- I hope for better things.

Labels: ,


Saturday, March 01, 2008

Canadian culture to get censored 

Our fearless leader and his minions are up to it again. Not content with selling out to the RIAA and MPAA, they're now trying to censor the Canadian film industry by withholding Telefilm funding for "unsuitable" movies. And of course, the effort was spearheaded by a well-known evangelical crusader who apparently has access to the inner circles in Ottawa. I can live with their neo-con economic policies, as bad as they may be, but this type of thing really makes my blood boil.
Charles McVety, president of the Canada Family Action Coalition, said his lobbying efforts included discussions with Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, and "numerous" meetings with officials in the Prime Minister's Office.

"We're thankful that someone's finally listening," he said yesterday. "It's fitting with conservative values, and I think that's why Canadians voted for a Conservative government."

Mr. McVety said films promoting homosexuality, graphic sex or violence should not receive tax dollars, and backbench Conservative MPs and cabinet ministers support his campaign.

Labels: ,


Sunday, February 10, 2008

Across the Universe 

We watched Across the Universe last night and enjoyed it. It's a musical, set in 1968, based on the Beatles' music. In typical musical style, there is a sketchy plot, with lots of musical set pieces, some of which are hilariously misguided (I Want to Hold Your Hand) and some chillingly effective (I Want You). There are also lots of lyrical references to Beatles songs that aren't sung. I might watch it again, just to catch some of the more obscure ones. It's definitely worth watching, although the best theatrical use of the Beatles' music still remains the soundtrack to Cirque du Soleil's Love.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Cthulhu coming to the big screen 

H. P. Lovecraft's Cthulhu is coming to the big screen sometime in 2010. Guillermo del Toro, director of the wonderful Pan's Labyrinth, is going to direct an adaptation of one of Lovecraft's best known stories, The Mountains of Madness.
del Toro wants to film that version of the story, even though "iit's a compilation of really dry scientific annotations that happen to be annotating something really scary. There is no character or dramatic thread." So you know, kind of like Cloverfield, except with monsters that will make you crap your pants. Given his track record, we're pretty sure he'd do a spectacular job with this and keep it from devolving into Aliens Vs. Predator.

Labels: ,


Sunday, January 27, 2008

Sunshine 

We finally got around to renting Sunshine last night. It's an SF movie about the crew of a spaceship who are carrying a bomb to the sun to reignite it after it starts dimming. Although the plot seems implausible, the movie is very well done with excellent special effects and above average writing and acting. Definitely recommended.

Labels: ,


Saturday, January 19, 2008

Cloverfield 

Cloverfield is a monster movie for the post-9/11 era, a monster movie that hardly shows you the monster until the very end of the movie, full of shots of collapsing buildings in the distance and people running screaming through clouds of dust in New York streets. Shot entirely with hand-held cameras, it's capable of nauseating you if you're subject to motion sickness (I wouldn't recommend sitting in the first few rows) as one unfortunate girl in last night's audience found out. There are obvious similarities to the Blair Witch Project.

I enjoyed the movie. It's very fast paced, once you get through the establishing opening sequences, and quite well done. At it's heart, it's still a B-grade monster flick, but done with an unusual style and a lot of flair. The major weakness is that the characters are pretty much dispensable - the only one I identified with was the guy who spent the movie doing the filming and you hardly ever see his face.

There are a couple of good reviews on the web, here and here.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Science fictionalized movie posters 

Worth1000.com is sponsoring another Photoshopping contest - this on one movie posters altered with science fiction themes. Some of them are truly hilarious - take a look at Pinnochio's Revenge and the Shrekinator.

Labels: , ,


Saturday, January 12, 2008

Sarah Connor Chronicles might be good 

SciFi Weekly has a very positive review of the first two episodes of The Sarah Connor Chronicles, the new TV show based on the Terminator movies. It premieres tomorrow night.
Lena Headey does a fine job of reinventing Sarah Connor, while maintaining all the edge Linda Hamilton, the original Sarah Connor, had in Terminator 2: Judgment Day. Fresh from a very different role in 300, Headey is tough and uncompromising, but she also has fragile and loving moments that lead to Sarah becoming a well-rounded character.

As for Thomas Dekker's John Connor, he does an excellent job of defining a character who never seemed to be as well-realized as he should have been in the movie series. However, it's Summer Glau who has the toughest role as she turns her mostly expressionless character into someone we care about. Glau is a lovely actress with an otherworldly quality, and it is fun to watch her toss around men three times her size.

The only complaints about the pilot are minor, such as Sarah's failure to use an alias after she moves on with John initially. That key mistake leads to lots of trouble for our heroes, and it's one she wouldn't have made. She had two years to have an alias ready to go. Aside from such minor nitpicking, and the fact that Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles has a really long name, this looks to be the next great action series.

Labels: ,


Thursday, January 10, 2008

Childhood's End: The Movie? 

Childhood's End is perhaps my favourite SF novel of the 1950s and certainly my favourite of all Arthur C. Clarke's works. Now that digital effects have caught up to the aliens and settings in the movie, I've been hoping that someone would turn the book into a movie, and it looks like that might happen.
It sounds super trippy, and Clarke already mined it for the plot of 2001: A Space Odyssey. Peirce says the movie's draft script deals with big ideas, like whether humans can accept alien saviors who look like the devil. But it also has cool-looking space travel and a visit to the aliens' homeworld, so she'll need at least $70 million to make this thing. That, in turn, means she needs backing from Universal and a big star. I'd love to see Peirce make a science fiction movie, but maybe she could adapt something newer?

I find the comment about adapting something newer a bit odd. While the book is 50 years old, it hasn't dated anywhere near as much as a lot of other 50s SF; certainly any competent screenwriter could give it a modern feel while sticking to the basic story and Clarke's ideas. I even think you could do it as an opera - I'd love to hear what Philip Glass would do with it.

Labels: ,


Monday, January 07, 2008

Aliens versus Predator: Requiem 

I just got back from Aliens versus Predator: Requiem. The IMDB review was pretty negative, but I didn't think the movie was that bad, though it's nothing more than a B monster movie. I like B monster movies, so I'll give it three stars. But be warned - it's very gory and not for the squeamish. And if you're pregnant, don't even think about watching this one. Trust me. Don't go.

Labels:


Tuesday, January 01, 2008

Once 

We watched a pretty good movie last night - an Irish film called Once. It's a musical, though not in the traditional mode - music makes up about 60 percent of the movie but it's so tightly integrated into the storyline about a street musician who falls in love with a Czech girl he meets on the street that you don't realize you're watching a musical. I really liked this movie. It's touching, feels true to life, and the music is excellent. I'm not the only one who likes it either - it has an IMDB rating of 8.0, which puts it in the same league as the 1933 King Kong, The Terminator, and Spartacus

Labels:


Friday, December 28, 2007

Taking digital F/X to the next level 

The next level of digital animation will use software that simulates the physical properties of the real world and understands how objects interact with each other and the world around them. Wired Magazine profiles Jos Stam, a programmer working for AutoDesk in Toronto, who's working on building those capabilities into the widely used Maya animation package.
Stam likes hideous complications. He works for Autodesk, the software company that produces Maya, the world's leading 3-D modeling software. Maya has shaped nearly every CG visual effect you've seen since 1998 — from the first Matrix to the newest Spider-Man.

With his current project, a new module for Maya called Nucleus, Stam is getting closer than ever to his goal. Stam's formulas allow two or three elements to interact as they would in the real word — smoke with wind, or fabric with solid objects. What hasn't been accomplished yet is a system that can encompass and express dynamically all of the earthly elements and physical laws at once. Stam wants software that can play God with pixels. Right now, he's only in the early stages, but Nucleus is taking the special effects world a step closer to Stam's dream of a unified physics-driven system that can produce eye-popping visual effects all by itself.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, December 26, 2007

The Leading Edge 

If you have some spare time on your hands over the holidays, check out The Leading Edge. It's the web site for the the Canadian TV show of the same name and many of their episodes are online. I watched one about an advanced radio telescope that was built in British Columbia and shipped to Chile and it was fascinating.

Labels:


Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Blade Runner: The Final Cut 

Blade Runner: The Final Cut is out today and now I know what I'm going to use my mother's Christmas money to buy. The Digital Bits has an exhaustive review of the release, outlining what's on each of the disks (there can be up to 5 disks, depending on which version of the movie you buy).

Blade Runner is one of the few movies that deserves such in-depth treatment. Although it had limited success when it first came out (and I admit to not liking it much at the time), its held up incredibly well. Or maybe we've caught up with it.
If The Duellists was the film that first garnered Scott critical notice, and it was Alien that brought him to the attention of a much wider audience... Blade Runner is the film that solidified his acclaim among hard-core cinephiles and earned him a loyal legion of fans. Scott's near manic attention to detail and his use of rich, stylish and atmospheric staging and camera setups were on full, unrestrained display here - a fact that caused significant problems with his producers and the studio at the time. Surprisingly, when the film was released into theaters, it was a critical and commercial bomb. Many people just didn't know what to make of it. Over the years, however, opinions have shifted dramatically. Blade Runner is, today, considered one of the best films (if not THE best) in Scott's decidedly impressive body of work. It showcases Ridley at his most... well, Ridley. Even at the time of its original release back in 1982, Blade Runner quickly and definitively set its director apart from other filmmakers as a singular, visionary talent.

Labels: ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?